Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was the Gingrich "glitter bomb" appropriate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:16 PM
Original message
Poll question: Was the Gingrich "glitter bomb" appropriate?
Was the action taken by activist Nick Espinosa appropriate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Silly question.
Glitter is always appropriate. Gingrich is never appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. +1. Ha ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. A harpoon would have been more appropriate...
for that load of blubber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'd prefer an "it wasn't inappropriate" option. there's a keen differnce there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, Jail would be appropriate.
For preaching hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. what glitter bomb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Guy walked up to Newt and threw glitter at him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. no, legally/technically it's assault
speaking up and using your voice, even loudly, even rudely is A-OK, throwing stuff on people is not, I don't care who they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. True and beyond
it is also just plain stupid. When a man you oppose is simmering in the juices of his own stupidity, you leave him there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I believe you mean battery. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. if it was from behind perhaps
if he saw it then it was assault and battery, but nowadays, the common term is assault (e.g. there is no "battery" offense in the military it is all assault).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Looking for that 15 mins. of fame. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why not
It's cheaper than Tiffany's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Appropriate, not really. Entertaining, yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think it was lazy.
What was it meant to convey anyway?

I get the whole throwing shoes at Bush thing because its a legitimate symbol of disrespect in the Arab world.

What is throwing glitter on someone supposed to mean besides "You're fabulous! Let's party!"?

I think we can do better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Have you ever used glitter?
Edited on Wed May-18-11 07:01 PM by JackBeck
It sticks around FOREVER. And even when you think it's all gone, you'll find it show up around the house, in bed, in your hair, etc.

It's a quite brilliant act of citizen protest. Newt will be reminded of his anti-gay bigotry and this protest for months, regardless of how much he tries to forget the embarrassment.

You'd think having a lesbian sister would have changed him, but Cheney was still promoted majorly homophobic policies while having a lesbian daughter, so at the end of the day these Republican 'family values' proponents just continue to stew in their own hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC