Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Bill Calls for Eliminating 43 Education Programs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:43 AM
Original message
House Bill Calls for Eliminating 43 Education Programs
Forty-three education programs would be scrapped under a bill introduced today by Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Education and the Workforce subcommittee that oversees K-12 policy. For background, read this post.

"It's time to trim the fat," Hunter said in a statement. "Today I will introduce legislation that will eliminate—not consolidate, not defund, but eliminate—43 wasteful K-12 education programs. At a time when approximately one-third of American fourth graders can't read, we must concentrate on education initiatives that have a track record of putting the needs of students first."

Among the programs the bill would eliminate are Striving Readers, the Even Start Family Literacy Program, and the National Writing Project.

Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., the chairman of the House education committee, and Rep. Howard P. "Buck" McKeon, R-Calif., a senior committee member and former chairman, are co-sponsors.

more . . . http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2011/05/house_calls_for_eliminating_mo.html?cmp=ENL-EU-NEWS1

Some of the cuts:

Even Start Family Literacy Program, Enhancing Education Through Technology, Striving Readers, the National Writing Project, Smaller Learning Communities, Reading is Fundamental, Improving Literacy Through School Libraries, Elementary and Secondary School Counseling, Teaching American History, School Leadership, Grants to Reduce Alcohol Abuse, Community Technology Centers, Bilingual and Emergency Immigrant Education Program, Star Schools, Early Reading First, Comprehensive School Reform, and the Ready to Teach Grant Program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. "At a time when 1/4 of all house republicans can't read
we need to trim the stupid out of our political system."

Drale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. I HATE that asshole John Kline and just wrote and told him so.
And also asked where the jobs are he and his fellow assholes promised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Righties are serious and have made their points clear.
They want small government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. if you have 1/3 of fourth graders that don't read
you have a MUCH larger systemic problem than a few programs...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I wouldn't trust a word that comes out of Duncan Hunter's mouth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. good thing we don't have 1/3 of 4th graders who can't read. but thanks for catapulting the neolib
propaganda.

there sure is a lot of that at DU, especially on education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. good thing I was just talking about what the article said
otherwise I might offend your sensibilities. of course, you could have lambasted the OP but you decided to speak to my response...interesting.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. no, you were talking about what a republican privatizer said: Duncan Hunter, R-Calif
Edited on Sat May-14-11 11:15 PM by Hannah Bell
and he's a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. right and it is a major point in the article posted in the OP
but you only seem to see it in my post...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. A major point that is CLAIMED by Duncan Hunter
He's a dishonest right wing hack. I don't believe him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. i wasn't speaking to the veracity of the claim... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QED Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. 1/3 of 4th graders can't read - so let's eliminate early reading programs
Yeah, that's the ticket.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. my question is
why could kids read BEFORE these programs and what have these programs shown to work? what is the return from time/money/effort put into them. if they are failing, let's do away with them and find/do something that works.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They couldn't.
But few cared.

There are some risky inferences from the stats. For instance, the cohorts that did really badly in school still do really badly in school--it's just that they comprise a somewhat larger percentage of the population even as their racial demographics change. (The cohorts that did well actually do better than their predecessors did. Otherwise we'd have a downtrend instead of what's essentially a flat line.)

Some of the programs show improvement in early reading readiness. Mostly it's an accident. They claim to teach things like phonemic awareness, but while "teaching" phonemic awareness they have a lot of interaction with the kids and increase their vocabulary--which is what actually increases phonemic awareness. The researchers generally know that everybody wants to believe what they say, so they have really sucky controls. "We will teach phonemic awareness using these materials, but radically alter the interactional environment *and* teach phonics, then say all of the increase in results is because of our materials." Wouldn't fly in a science dept. It's cheered in ed depts.

Most of the effect of early childhood intervention is gone by 4th grade for most kids, although you can still find traces of it (statistically significant, but faint) at age 18 and 19. What happens is that many the kids who need EC intervention tend to lose "grade level" points sometimes as much as a third of a year, over summer; few gain any. Those who really don't need EC intervention often actually gain grade level tenths, up to a third of a year, over summer break. Take a class with everybody at 3.0 at the end of third grade. Return for 4th grade and one group of kids is back at 2.7 and need review to regain lost ground; another group of kids is as 3.3 and coasts for the first few months.

There is a payback: Some kids retain the advantage that they were given well enough to come out even in 4th and 5th grade, and stay even. It's really expensive per kid, but there's no good way (that I've heard of) of determining which kids will stay with it and which won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. How about let's not trust a shithead republican or his data
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. i honestly don't know if these myriad programs work
i do know the state of education is radically changed over the years...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. my question is, why do you believe Duncan Hunter, R-Calif?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. yeah, because you believe there is nothing wrong with the education
system in this country. everything is hunky dory...that way, you don't have to think about what might be wrong and how to fix it. if you believe everything is A-OK then you are in denial.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe we should start by trimming the "FAT" in the republican party. They remind me
of corporate hatchet men that came in and cut the companies to shreds with layoffs and then later the company went out of business because they had lost their core competences.

Meanwhile the corp. hatchet men floated off with golden parachutes to repeat the same stunt.

The people that had done the real work in the corp. were gone and these fat asses soaked up the cash, sold off assets and raked in zillions. I am so fucken tired of the bullshit from the republican party. Wake the fuck up Americans for a change!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. A quick look at a piece of the fat
http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/doc/about.csp

I'm getting pretty fucking sick of dumbasses who substitute vague ideological declarations (especially of the anti-government variety) for substantive discussion of public policy issues. Kline needs to explain to us why this sensible looking program is "fat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC