Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think killing rather than capturing OBL was brilliant in terms of domestic politics but not

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
howard112211 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:39 AM
Original message
I think killing rather than capturing OBL was brilliant in terms of domestic politics but not
Edited on Sat May-14-11 08:45 AM by howard112211
in terms of foreign policy.

Sure enough, the Obama administration made the Republicans look like complete buffoons and wiped out one of their big self-proclaimed credential: The "toughness" on terror. Moreover, presenting the whole thing as a done deal, almost completely out of no where, caused them to fall over themselves trying to devise some sort of talking point, which they ultimately failed at. A Bin Laden in captivity would have offered much more space for criticism of some sort. I think the whole act will do a lot to get Obama reelected.

In terms of foreign policy I think it was not so brilliant. I think there are many people out there, in particular in the middle east, who don't think the case against Bin Laden was strong enough. I think a swift trial where all the evidence against him was recounted transparently, followed by an execution, would have eliminated 90% of the shitstorm that likely will break loose, in particular with Pakistan and also in the larger context of the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.

Moreover I don't buy the whole "wave of hostage taking and retaliations" line. It's not like they are not trying to do that anyway. If Al Qaeda or their supporters would be able to hijack a plane, they would do so, with or with Bin Laden in captivity. I think the perception that America can violate the national sovereignty of another country to kill someone is much more damaging and might sway a lot of moderates. Moreover, China and Russia, and also Pakistan will likely use this as a precedent to deal with their enemies.

And also, it cements the whole "war against terror" paradigm, which treats terrorism as warfare rather than law enforcement, which is related to my previous point: I think whenever the standards of what constitutes warfare are lowered, this is bad news, in likely will affect how other foreign powers deal with their enemies, and lead to further undermining the concept of international law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is quite a bit of truth in your post.
Consider this a kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. No duh. K+1=R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. bin Laden could have walked through the front door of the US embassy in SA wearing a strait jacket..
And he wasn't going to get anything remotely resembling an open and honest trial in the US.

Far too much dirty water under some awfully rickety but very expensive bridges to open that particularly fragrant and extra jumbo size can of worms.

I read here on DU the other day that Obama referenced the fact that bin Laden would never see a courtroom some years ago, there was an OP on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's not about him.
Edited on Sat May-14-11 09:20 AM by mmonk
It's about whether he took us with him. Appears so to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. We've been through the looking glass and down the damn rabbit hole so many times now..
We ought to get a frequent flyer discount and sky miles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
F Bastiat Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. A trial would have quickly devolved into a circus...
Aside from being a financial boon for the ACLU, it would have been a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It would have been at GITMO. Networks wouldn't cover it except 1st day and sentencing.
Without an audience, a circus is just a lot of elephants and clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The ACLU? Don't think so
They pick their cases carefully. They wouldn't go NEAR a bin Laden trial.

Besides, they're a DOMESTIC rights organization, for US citizens only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. There are plenty on this site who will announce that there is no international law
Edited on Sat May-14-11 09:47 AM by sibelian

and loudly invoke the international rights of the US in the same sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. The International Community Is Not As Up in Arms As You Think
I don't see any rage in the streets or calls of outrage from most countries. I think that the world already knew that OBL was guilty because of his actions and his own taped confessions.

Killing him made the most sense, and except for a few DUers and others, everyone else is perfectly fine with this action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. If the yet again attacks on Muslim targets by Al Qeada this week didn't convince people
than nothing will. Frankly I think most Muslims don't need convincing which is why you had more protests for that stupid book burning and those cartoons than you had for America killing Bin Laden. Terrorists that target their own people aren't well liked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC