Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teen porn star Bieyanka Moore's disaster (porn company didn't know she was 15...)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:42 PM
Original message
Teen porn star Bieyanka Moore's disaster (porn company didn't know she was 15...)
Teen porn star Bieyanka Moore's disaster

In early 2010, Tyler Chanel Evans, a 19-year-old exotic dancer, took under her wing a pretty, homeless girl who said her name was Bieyanka. The girl had been standing for hours outside a convenience store with an overstuffed duffel bag. A few days later, the waif stole Evans's expired learner's permit and copied her social security number.

The samaritan stripper filed a police report, but nothing came of it.

Then Bieyanka ran wild, adopting Evans's identity and racking up criminal charges including possession of a stolen vehicle and grand larceny. The girl skipped court appearances, so Evans was arrested twice. Once she was even jailed for 13 hours.

...

Bieyanka, it seems, outwitted many people. She wasn't 20 as she had told Evans, but a 15-year-old runaway from Palm Beach Shores. She persuaded the State of Nevada — perhaps with an adult's help — to improperly issue her a driver's license in Evans's name. And using that license, she duped Miami pornographers into illegally hiring her to have sex onscreen.

At least that's the way Evans and lawyers for Brickell-based online porn giant Reality Kings tell it. In December 2010, the girl's mother, Sherrita Smalley, sued RK Netmedia, Reality Kings' owner, for disseminating a video in which the 15-year-old — using the stage name "Bieyanka Moore" — stripped nude, had intercourse, and traded oral sex with a 24-year-old man.

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2011-05-12/news/teen-porn-star-bieyanka-moore-s-disaster/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. *Grabs Popcorn*
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. identity theft can be a never-ending disaster...
I only had a few low-limit credit cards taken out by someone using my name, and that was a big enough headache...Compared to this story, I was pretty lucky...

Oh yeah, and that girl's parents fail at life...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bieyanka needs a lot of help, and her parents obviously failed at raising her properly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. parent.
she was born to a 21 year old, single woman, and from the article, it sounds like she had a pretty tough time just trying to survive with her daughter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. tracy lords was 16 when she started....
and she cost the industry millions....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. THAT's the name I was trying to think of
thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does this mean that anyone who bought from that company can be arrested for possessing kiddie porn?
How would you go about recalling porn productions like that? Send out a notice?

Unlike people who own certain makes of cars and register with their manufacturer, its not like these porno outfits have a list of who all their customers are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Send out a notice with a picture of her on it.
"If you see THIS face, THESE breasts, THESE buttocks, and/or THIS vagina, stop watching it immediately and delete it from your hard drive. They belong to a 15-year-old!"



Of course, disseminating the warning poster it in itself creation and distribution of child pornography. Maybe have a police artist do a sketch of the parts in question?

They'd have to fly him outside the 12-mile limit, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. DU's defenders of the always nobel porn industry will struggle with this one
Edited on Sat May-14-11 03:00 AM by Sen. Walter Sobchak
The industry standard for any sort of wrong doing is always "plausible deniability" on the part of the producers. Be it trespassing and filming where not permitted to employing extremely high risk for STD talent, to this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavyDem Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The article already covers it.
The law does not offer a defense for the minor lying about their age. There undoubtedly will be a shit storm resulting from all of this. The company that produced it can be charged for producing and distributing child porn, the "actor" that she had sex with could be charged for statutory rape.

That young lady needs to get some help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. anyone thrown in prison will be a peon
The entire business model of the "adult industry" is a firewall between those who assume all the risk and those who assume little risk but take virtually all the rewards. There is also little disincentive to these risks because many of the working entities have absolutely no assets so it doesn't matter if their sued, shutdown or seized and are staffed by completely disposable people. This is somewhat in contrast to the uhh... more reputable large enterprises who can't possibly risk criminal charges, judgments or PR problems that would risk their lucrative mainstream distribution channels.

To my great disgust I have family in this business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chris_Texas Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. That seems like a flimsy case there.
Never fly in court. You only need one person out of twelve with a brain.

You cannot legally rent or see a car to a minor either, so potentially anyone who did that faces the same danger, but again it isn't going to happen. The girl was impersonating someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chris_Texas Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Not sure what exactly there is to defend....
What part of this unfortunate incident are you trying to lay at the feet of the adult entertainment industry? Who here is the victim, if not the woman who's identity she stole, the male actor involved, the movie producers and distributers and crew, or perhaps those who purchased the movie?

Or are you perhaps trying to suggest that all of these people in her life, from the woman who found her and tried to help and was then victimized for it, to her parents who very well might have been fantastic for all we know, to the movie company folks who -- again for all you know -- might have rushed her straight to the police or social services had they known the truth?

Sex is not evil, nor is pornography. For some reason the majority of humans like it to some degree or other, including likely those who refuse to watch it for one reason or other. There is no invisible sky monster waiting to hurl you into loving eternal punishment for watching it, nor to reward you with an eternity of singing thanks for refusingto do so. It's just porn, that's all.

And this case isn't even about the porn. It is about the criminal adventures of a teen runaway in a nation in which physically mature teens are caught in a trap -- they can't work, have no way to provide for themselves, can't legally rent an appartment, and yet society has few if any social safety net that covers them. Little kids yes, adults somewhat, but teens? Nothing.

And somehow, out of all this, you see porn as the problem. PORN! in scary all caps. I suppose when you are looking for just that, that's what you see.

I bet you were an ace at those "Where's Waldo" books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. i'm suggesting they don't give a fuck
Seeing as their due diligence amounts to checking an out of state drivers license and a social security numident. Which I am guessing a fifteen year old runaway had probably never heard of and was assisted in obtaining. I might be able to muster some sympathy for the unwitting accomplices caught up in this - but it is the way the industry operates and their indifference to all sorts of things that allowed it to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC