Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The consistency of the widths demands an explanation. ESA report.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 06:06 PM
Original message
The consistency of the widths demands an explanation. ESA report.
http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=4eefp0kj

>> "An incredible network of filamentary structures" seen in a cloud of cold gas in the constellation of the Southern Cross. The ESA report dated 2 October 2009. “That a dark, cool area such as this would be bustling with activity, was unexpected. But the images reveal a surprising amount of turmoil: the interstellar material is condensing into continuous and interconnected filaments glowing from the light emitted by new-born stars at various stages of development.”

In an ESA report last month the high-resolution of the Herschel space observatory produced another surprise, “The filaments are huge, stretching for tens of light years through space and Herschel has shown that newly-born stars are often found in the densest parts of them... Such filaments in interstellar clouds have been glimpsed before by other infrared satellites, but they have never been seen clearly enough to have their widths measured. Now, Herschel has shown that, regardless of the length or density of a filament, the width is always roughly the same. “This is a very big surprise,” says Doris Arzoumanian, Laboratoire AIM Paris-Saclay, CEA/IRFU, the lead author on the paper describing this work. Together with Philippe André from the same institute and other colleagues, she analysed 90 filaments and found they were all about 0.3 light years across, or about 20,000 times the distance of Earth from the Sun. This consistency of the widths demands an explanation.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. God is an anal-retentive, obsessive perfectionist.
There, that explains everything.

Doesn't it?

Sonoman

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm sure the Pope wouldn't argue however I need something more,
something that actually makes sense. I know, I'll call NASA, never a straight answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He made Newt and the Nenis..
Doesn't sound like the action of an anal-retentive, obsessive perfectionist to me.

Unless he was trying to create a perfect Backpfeifengesicht.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Backpfeifengesicht
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. We're still ignorant of how ignorant we are
We are no more justified in thinking we know most of what there is to know than any other group of humans that ever thought that they knew everything.

This is why I find science romantic in a way that I could never get romantic about violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You are witnessing a Galileo type thing.... sit back and enjoy it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC