Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas Passes Ultrasound Requirement for Abortions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 02:23 PM
Original message
Texas Passes Ultrasound Requirement for Abortions
Posted: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 at 10:42 AM By Amanda Marcotte


Whenever a state passes a law, as Texas just did, that requires women who want abortions to get ultrasounds beforehand, I try to imagine what my reaction would be if I was forced to get an ultrasound before being allowed an abortion. I imagine it would be something like: "Holy crap! There's a fetus in there? Well, get it out. I was just coming in because I like having my uterus vaccumed out for no good reason, but now that I know there's a fetus in there, I really want to get this done. God forbid that grow into a baby. I don't want one of those!" Of course, I don't live in Texas anymore, so if I should ever need abortion services, I'd be lucky to go to a clinic in New York, where the state legislature doesn't assume that women are drooling morons.

Most abortion restrictions fall into two categories, with considerable overlap between them: putting up obstacles to abortion that make it harder to get and inflicting punishment on women for seeking abortion. So, regulations that dictate that the hallways have to be so many feet wide in a clinic that provides abortion is more the former, reading lectures at women who want abortions right in the doctor's office is more the latter, and waiting periods are a little of both. Ultrasound requirements are a burden because they use up clinic time and resources, which can limit the number of abortions they can provide (many clinics just have "abortion day" once a week), but I think they're mostly popular because the legislators who pass them get a cheap thrill out of using proxies to inflict pointless lectures on women about their naughty, slutty ways.

One thing we definitely know is the claims that the ultrasounds directly prevent abortion have no evidence for them. Preliminary research shows that ultrasounds have no effect on women's decisions to have abortions. This makes sense if you accept the premise, as I do, that women have functioning brains and ask for abortions precisely because they don't want to have developing embryos inside them. Conservative legislators have fantasies of women seeing fully formed babies on monitors, bursting into tears, and running out of the clinics. In reality, sometimes seeing an ultrasound makes it emotionally harder, but doesn't change a woman's mind. And sometimes it actually makes the decision easier, because most women abort early in their pregnancies, and the images they're looking at mainly show how tiny and unformed the embryo or fetus really is.

Still, this is no reason to be complacent about ultrasound laws. The premise of these laws, that women are uniquely stupid and need to be talked down to, enshrines inequality between men and women into law. Plus, these creeping encroachments on women's rights are moving toward a de facto ban on abortion, and, as I argued at RH Reality Check, it seems that South Dakota has actually crossed the line where they've regulated abortion out of existence in their state. It would be particularly bad if such a thing happened in Texas, which has a large population in need of abortion services and also takes in many women from nearby states who have little to no access at home.

http://www.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/texas-passes-ultrasound-requirement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the anti-women league rolls on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. war on women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. The antiabortion crowd is over reaching with all of these draconina laws.
ultra sounds, three day waiting periods, requiring "counseling" at "pregnancy centers" etc.

Americans are fair people. They will see these laws as fundamentally unfair and draconian. This will backfire on the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sorry,Texas women. I tried. I really tried to stop this.
I wrote several editorials on how inhumane and impractical this was. Even my "practical" Republican neighbors opposed this. They are becoming a rarity in Texas,too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. From my experience with Planned Parenthood.......
.....they always do an ultra-sound to determine how far along the pregnancy is so they can determine what procedure to use. I live in Texas and this was only 4-5 months ago. So, this sounds more like chest thumping more than anything because it's already being done! Big whoop. Rick Perry is a piece of shit. Just glad I don't live close enough to smell the bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC