Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Means Testing Medicare Makes Medicare An Entitlement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:14 PM
Original message
Means Testing Medicare Makes Medicare An Entitlement
Instead of a single payer insurance program for seniors. And, once it officially becomes an entitlement, then it becomes politically easier to get rid of it entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's an entitlement by definition of the word "entitlement" without changing a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, Right Now, It's An Insurance Program That We All Pay Into
An entitlement is a right to something. If you pay for something, it's not an entitlement. It's a contracted legal obligation to provide the service.

Means testing means that certain people would not get the insurance, but they'd stil have to pay for it. That means that certain members of the population would then get an entitlement instead of an insurance program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. An entitlement is "a right granted by law or contract
(especially a right to benefits)". It has nothing to do with who is funding the program. Social Security is, in fact, an entitlement.

Of course it's an entitlement. BUT THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH ENTITLEMENTS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. But at least guys like Donald Trump wouldn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And Doing That Makes Medicare Politically Vulnerable
When only some members of the population would get it, while others pay for it, then you create an entitlement, and that makes medicare politically vulnerable. It would quickly lose support, and it would eventually go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yep ! I was really trying to be funny but sometimes it just doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. It already is an entitlement
but your point is well taken. Means testing may save a little money now, but then Medicare becomes just another welfare program for the poor (or at least that is how it will be perceived), and hence more subject to political attacks, just like food stamps, welfare, Medicaid, Head Start and LIHEAP.

Keep the government out of our Medicare!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. makes me wonder how good is Medicare these days
Called this a.m. to try to get an appt. for my husband and they did not even bother to return the call.

Mega bucks going into this program and can't even get a call back? Shows how important people are on Medicare to the system (doesn't pay out enough is my thought).

:argh: :argh: :argh:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Makes sense
If they can achieve means testing, then there will be those that are forced (by law) to pay in to the system, but then ultimately do not receive any benefits for their contribution. Perhaps that "new feature" would be enough for the Supreme Court to declare the whole program unconstitutional. Problem solved through the courts, simple and BEST of all politically convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's already means tested - I pay extra because of my husbans's income
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC