Wall Street Journal launches WikiLeaks imitation

[Playinghardball]

Source: Raw Story
By Agence France-Presse

WASHINGTON — The Wall Street Journal launched a WikiLeaks rival called "SafeHouse" on Thursday, calling for online submissions to help uncover fraud and abuse in business and politics.

"If you have newsworthy contracts, correspondence, emails, financial records or databases from companies, government agencies or non-profits, you can send them to us using the SafeHouse service," the Journal said at wsj.safehouse.com.

The newspaper said SafeHouse's security features include file encryption and the possibility for a contributor or whistleblower to remain anonymous.

More at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/05/wall-street-journal-launches-wikileaks-imitation/

[Ian David]

1. *OR*... you COULD just use WikiLeaks. n/t

[aSpeckofDust]

2. lol.. with the way this country punishes whistle blowers, the site's motto may as well be..

"No good deed goes unpunished."

[madrchsod]

3. what a joke..

sounds like a good way to take a piece of the action...

[Ian David]

4. Don’t Leak to the Wall Street Journal’s New Wikileaks Knockoff

Don’t Leak to the Wall Street Journal’s New Wikileaks Knockoff

Adrian Chen — The Wall Street Journal is trying to make a play for whistleblowers with its very own Wikileaks clone, SafeHouse. But SafeHouse is the opposite of safe, thanks to basic security flaws and fine print that lets the Journal rat on leakers.

SafeHouse, which launched today to much fanfare, promises to let leakers "securely share information with the Wall Street Journal," by uploading documents directly to its servers, just like Wikileaks! But unlike Wikileaks, SafeHouse includes a doozy of a caveat in its Terms of Use:

"Except when we have a separately negotiated confidentiality agreement… we reserve the right to disclose any information about you to law enforcement authorities or to a requesting third party, without notice, in order to comply with any applicable laws and/or requests under legal process, to operate our systems properly, to protect the property or rights of Dow Jones or any affiliated companies, and to safeguard the interests of others."

So, go ahead and upload your explosive documents to SafeHouse. But if they publish a scoop based on your material and someone gets mad, they can sell you out to anyone for any reason, including the insanely broad one of safeguarding "the interests of others." (And Rupert Murdoch, who controls the paper, sure has a lot of interests!)

Although you might get outed by hackers before you're sold out to the cops. Despite the WSJ's assurances that the SafeHouse submission system is secure, it is "rife with amateur security flaws." Security researcher Jacob Appelbaum has been tweeting out a stream of holes he's spotted in SafeHouse's security. He calls the Journal's claim that people submitting documents can remain anonymous if they choose a "blatant lie". Appelbaum knows a thing about security: He's one of the chief developers of the anonymizing software TOR, which SafeHouse ironically recommends leakers use to help hide their identity. (Granted, Appelbaum has a horse in the race, since he's been a prominent Wikileaks volunteer.)

More:
http://gawker.com/#!5799112/dont-leak-to-the-wall-street-journals-new-wikileaks-knockoff