Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REALITY CHECK: Is it really OK for Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) to reveal "classified briefing" details?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 04:42 PM
Original message
REALITY CHECK: Is it really OK for Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) to reveal "classified briefing" details?
http://www2.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Sarah+Palin+Campaigns+Sen+Saxby+Chambliss+-ZiVCcvn0Njl.jpg

A senior U.S. official also told Fox News that only one of the five people killed in the raid was carrying a weapon and firing. The detail seemed at first to diverge from White House accounts claiming the Navy SEALs encountered resistance throughout the raid and were engaged in a firefight during much of the 40-minute operation. However, the scene was described as chaotic, with U.S. forces encountering barricades and women in the compound screaming and attacking the men.

The U.S. team, in their training, had anticipated that bin Laden had a suicide vest and that the house was rigged. The official bristled at the notion that the compound was somehow an easy target with reports that only one person was armed.

"He was the one guy shot who had a gun in his hand and was firing when he was shot -- other weapons were at the scene," the official said. "When the SEALs reached the third floor, after resistance and physical barricades, Usama bin Laden did not immediately surrender. When someone like UBL who has said he wants to kill as many Americans as possible, doesn't 150 percent surrender, you have to assess as a threat."

Another source familiar with the operation said the first shot fired at bin Laden, when he poked his head out of his bedroom, missed. That detail was first revealed by Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., based on information he got during a classified briefing to members of Congress. Afterward, two different SEALs fired on bin Laden, one hitting his chest and one hitting his forehead.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/05/official-1-killed-bin-laden-raid-armed-firing/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure he'll get a sternly worded letter. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would say no...
But most of all I really hate these asshats who think we need to be telling all of our Navy SEAL secrets! If we tell the world and the rest of the terrorists how we operate, we're doomed. What utter bullshit! So dangerous, so foolish to even consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is a cell ready for him right next to Bradly Manning.
Oh, thats right, he is a rich republican. Laws do not apply to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of course! Who knew he of all people would be for transparency!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Its not 'really 'OK for saxby chambliss to say ANYTHING,
after what he said about Max Cleland, and I'm sure this is NOT JMO.

:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. No. His clearance should be taken away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. No. Throw him in with Manning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of course it is...He's Republican....They can have you killed, piss on your grave and their...
Democratic counterparts will slap them on the back !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. No
Yank his security clearance :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. No! Having worked with confidential information, this is the lowest of the low.
Whatever information is revealed is up to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Chamblis is a Vietnam era legal draft dodger
who defeated a Vietnam hero who lost 3 limbs by ... saying the heor and Osama were the same.

I think Chamblis should be banned from future briefings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. for the love of all things good and sweet, candy, parades and hot air balloons,
It's Okay If A Republican Does It.

How many times MUST this be explained. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't believe in classified information, so I don't care who does it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC