Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Republicans aren't very good at music

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 07:36 PM
Original message
Why Republicans aren't very good at music


If need be, this can get moved to the lounge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Would "Teabagging Jizzbuckets" have been ok, though?
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting comment.
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 07:49 PM by RandomThoughts
How many artist and writers told that they had to conform to someone elses undefensible position to be seen or heard.

I figured better to not give someone the concept of control over if you are 'heard' or not, because their restrictions are trying to take away your ability to be heard. By only them being heard.

If someone says you have to be like them to be heard, then you wont be heard if you agree to that restriction. I figured it was better to explain to them, by not agreeing with that.


However, as many can see, even a person making that agreement is still heard, making the whole concept of some group being able to make that restriction or make you agree to their terms on what you say mean nothing, since even those that do agree to that are heard in many ways also.

So the whole concept is ridiculous.

However I am still due beer and travel money, and I could have enough faith to join their concept so that I am 'heard' as they said it, and still would be heard, so either way such requirements are irrelevant. But to show them that, figured not agreeing with them was a great way to show that, since they can't restrict anyways.


Or to support all those people that signed up with some group of people, you still got to say many things you really believe in your heart, or to help many people, so them telling you that you could only say what they wanted you to say, never worked anyways.


All it proves is the concept of some agreement with some system to be able to be heard, means absolutely nothing. Although some think it means something.


And I am still due beer and travel money and many experiences, and I know you have heard that also :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. i saw those guys open for bryan adams at madison square
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC