Can I Get Some Clarity On What The Infraction Was Here?

[Beetwasher]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=533827&mesg_id=533827

Was it just a bunch of hurt feelings? Seriously guys, I hardly complain, but I'm not sure what the line is here that I apparently crossed, except maybe some people just don't know how to handle superb satire and are embarrassed by their inconsistent positions. I Would appreciate some clarity because I can't figure out what rule was broken to have those posts deleted, while the thread is filled with people celebrating the fantasy of primarying our Democratic President. Am I not allowed to highlight how ridiculous their position is? Is this no longer tolerated?

[EarlG]

1. The moderators felt

that you were spamming and being deliberately disruptive.

[Beetwasher]

2. Ok Thanks, That Kinda Doesn't Really Provide Clarity Though

How was it spamming and disruptive? That was not my intent so perhaps it's hard for me to see this position. Is it a matter of the number of posts? Is it content? Can you be more specific? I'm trying to understand so I don't repeat the offense.

So my parody/shtick was more disruptive and spam-like than posters who constantly post calling Obama a spineless corporate sell out? That type of shtick is not disruptive, by my shtick was?

Or is it a matter of banding enough posters together to alert and complain that my posts are spamming and disruptive?