When I talk about a double standard in GDP, this is the type of thing I mean

[dsc]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=762866&mesg_id=762973

I have literally had more posts than I can count removed for the offense that is committed in this post. I have alerted not once, but twice, both times pointing out exactly what the problem was, but there it is in all its glory despite the very same moderator finding the ability and time to remove posts by me when Frenchie Cat alerts. This is a clear, utter, and total double standard.

[EarlG]

1. You said Jonathan Chait is a liar (which is of course not against the rules)

FrenchieCat took an opposing point of view and argued that he is not a liar.

Seven different moderators looked at that post and none of them saw a rule violation. I don't see it either.

[dsc]

2. the poster called me a liar

it said I don't see any liars but you. I have had posts removed for exactly that.

extended unemployment benefits, a continuation of certain small tax benefits for the middle class — are peanuts."

And Chait quoted him on that.

The fact that Reich went on to say that Republicans would have extended unemployment benefits
anyways is his speculation without any basis of fact to back it up.

So no one lied, except that you called Chait a liar.

Hence your OP is futile.....and defending what Reich said, as though he didn't say what he said
is silly.

end of quote bolding mine

how is what is in bold not calling me a liar? I again, have had countless posts removed for exactly the same construction. I would like an answer to that that isn't we don't see a rule violation here or the next time I will use this construction myself.