|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:12 AM Original message |
Paid into Medicare\caid for 35 - 65yr olds via reconciliation makes 2010 a slam dunk for dems... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
begin_within (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
1. Then what about 55-65-year-olds? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:29 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. cookies? Solyent Green. Oh wait a minute, I am in that demographic, forget it /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. edited...I thought they were already covered by early medicare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
2. You do realize that the current age to qualify for Medicare is 65? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleanime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The only problem with that is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Why would it need to be paid for by tax increase if people were buying into it? Also, I don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. They were two alternative ideas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 04:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. I'd rather have Medicaid than Medicare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Traveling_Home (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
5. CBO !!!!!!!!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. 35-65? If you can get that, I'll get right behind this bill in a heartbeat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gorekerrydreamticket (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. No one ever explains how much it would cost, say, a 55-year old in average health to "buy in" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC