Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama vs. Bill Clinton on taxes in the new American Crossroads ad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 12:57 PM
Original message
Barack Obama vs. Bill Clinton on taxes in the new American Crossroads ad
Announcer: “Two presidents. Two visions.”

Bill Clinton: “Should you raise taxes on anybody right today? Rich or poor or middle class. No.”

TV reporter: “This morning Obama is scheduled to unveil a new tax on Americans.”

Obama: “Pay higher taxes…Taxes…taxes…taxes.”

Clinton: "I Personally Don't Believe We Ought To Be Raising Taxes…It won’t solve the problem.”

Announcer: “A political stunt, not a solution. A bill full of tax increases.”

Obama: “Pass this bill…pass this bill…pass this bill.”

Announcer: “President Obama, it is time to attack problems, not people.”

--new ad attacking President Obama by American Crossroads GPS

(...)

In any case, if Clinton says he supports Obama’s jobs plan, how does Crossroads GPS suggest he does not? Let’s roll the videotape!

(video)

Here’s the full comment made by Clinton, with the part used in the ad in bold:



“Should you raise taxes on anybody right today — rich or poor or middle class? No, because there’s no growth in the economy. Should those of us who make more money and are in better position to contribute to America’s public needs and getting this deficit under control pay a higher tax rate when the economy recovers? Yes, that’s what I think.”

full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/barack-obama-vs-bill-clinton-on-taxes-in-the-new-american-crossroads-ad/2011/11/14/gIQAw7vpLN_blog.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why did you not mention the fact that the WAPO fact checker debunked this?
That is the entire point of the article ... the Ad is BS.

Why would a person posting this on DU not mention that fact?

Those who don't go to the link would never know that the Ad was a pack of lies.

Might be worth mentioning that in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's called ODS! EPIC FAIL!! (unrec'd)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC