Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gabby Gilford has a challenger for her seat these rethugs have no decency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 01:07 PM
Original message
Gabby Gilford has a challenger for her seat these rethugs have no decency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. If they had any, they wouldn't be Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is there any chance she will run for the Seante seat Kyl is vacating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think Giffords will have that job
as long as she wants it. I doubt the people of her district would ever consider voting her out. Not after what she has gone through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Uh, that's the way it works in this country.
Giffords will stand for election, just like every other House member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. it was bound to happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well...
sorry to say but that's the way it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. And if she hadn't been shot the GOPers would have run someone against her.
Representatives have to run for re-election every two years. Always. This is the way it works, nothing nefarious about it. If she has recovered enough to run again she will, and she will have the support of a lot of people. If she is not able to run, the Dems will have to find someone else, but the Repubs will find someone as well, either way. And so it goes. Every two years, no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. While that reflects the headline the article actually indicates that she
would most likely run unopposed. The Republican says that he is interested running if she doesn't run for re-election;


"If she is capable and has the physical ability to represent the district, I think she would be a formidable – almost unbeatable – foe," Antenori said. He's the only candidate so far who has said publicly he's even considering a run – but he also says he will probably cancel those plans if Giffords decides to make another bid for her seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. All's fair in politics.
It's called democracy. They can run a candidate if they choose to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Should the opposition party not run a candidate?
Do you think because someone suffers a personal tragedy they should remain in office unopposed for as long as the like?

As vile as many/most Republicans can be, it isn't good for anyone to allow elected officials to remain in office unchallenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. What does 'decency' have to do with it? The Repugs can run anyone they want.
Stupid thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I agree
Edited on Sat Aug-20-11 01:26 AM by golfguru
but she will win easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. really? you're serious? So if a republican had been the one shot, it would
be indecent for a dem to run against that person? What disturbing shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Of course a Democrat would run against anyone he/she wants to.
I think your definition of 'decency' is odd and weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. I have no problem with this! No one should!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. You make no sense at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. Injured or not, a free country needs a choice
It's up to the people to decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psycholitics Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. If she can serve, she can win.
Democracy requires choice. Whether you agree with the opposition is irrelevant. If Gabby is still able to serve, she is able to win a fair election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. That's democracy at work. I have no problem with this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bladian Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. Nonsensical post.
In a democracy, during an election, two people run against each other. If she's okay to go back to work, then she's okay to run a reelection race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-11 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC