Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone list all the progressive legislation Obama has vetoed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:43 PM
Original message
Can someone list all the progressive legislation Obama has vetoed?
You know, like when congress passed Single Payer Healthcare and Obama said "Not on my watch, liberal scum!".
Or how congress gave Obama all this stimulus money, and he said "No way, that's too much! VETO"

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now we wait. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There must be one example....
Like when Congress voted to close Guantanamo, and Obama was all "Not on my watch, hippies!"

I'm pretty sure that happened.

Just need a link or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here ya go:
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 09:50 PM by jenmito




















:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Nothing?!?!?!
More proof that Obama, the closet republican/corporatist sellout/generic villainous evildoer, was too weak to fight for a progressive agenda to veto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. The number that he vetoed is the same as he introduced.
Legislation is not the only game in town. There are progressive appointments being blocked that he does nothing to fight for, most recently ELizabeth Warren. Judgeships and administrative positions remain unfilled because he does not insist on action!!!!

There are the proposals that he poses such as closing Guantanamo or Terrorist trials in Civilian Courts that he lays down and rolls over when resisted, rather then applying the pressure that can only come from the Executive Branch.

Progressive promises from environment, to immigration to ending the war(s) that frustrate.

And the most galling thing about all of this capitulation is that he gets absolutely nothing for it. Never does he ever hold out for concessions, regardless of how often he has bowed to opposition, rather they just keep rolling him with impunity!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Do you see any limit to "executive pressure"?
Do you think that if Obama just really really wanted something, congress would forget all of it's conflicting priorities and cave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. The President is, by himself, one third of government.
A lot of power comes with the job.

I don't know if he wants to go into a re-election campaign complaining about how hard the job is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
75. "A lot of power."
See Articles I and III of the Constitution.

See Article I for Congress power and the limits on it even.

Oh and states have some powers, too.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Presidents don't introduce legislation. Legislators do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Whitehouses have regularly written frameworks and goals,
that are presented to the legislative branch for action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stklurker Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
47. frameworks to the legislature
Yes, and Pelosi and Reid were all over it in 2008.. they had all their fringe members in hand and helped queue legislation up through for him to sign into action.. Like healthcare :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
76. And Congress is free to completely ignore that
This would only represent Congress deciding whether to spend its time on something, as in, where does the WH stand.

This Congress would pass bills repealing Social Security, They know not to waste their time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
64. It doesn't matter who pens legislation. The only thing that matters is who introduces it.
Edited on Wed Aug-03-11 01:05 AM by cherokeeprogressive
The White House can write every word of a bill and hand it to a congresscritter, who can then introduce it. No problem there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. heh.
way to turn the tables on the snarky OP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Oh that is just a bunch of bull.
Please enlighten us as to how President Obama is supposed to force the Senate REPUBLICANS to vote 'yes' for cloture, on the nominations that they (the republicans) are blocking.

Even Elizabeth Warren was intelligent enough to realize that the GOP would 'never' allow her to get enough votes in the Senate to be confirmed.

Also, regarding the federal judiciary nominations - Obama has SEVERAL times (during speeches/press conferences and even in the SOTU) insisted that the Senate 'do their job' and get them confirmed.

So, I am all ears - how is Obama supposed to force the GOP stop the obstructing and to vote 'yes'?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. So your argument is that if the Dems don't pick up seats in the
House and Senate, there is no use in electing Obama in 2012?

Like I said, I don't think you want to go with the "Gosh this is hard" argument.

Too many of these posts sound like the shut out football coach who tells the journalist, "Our offense would have scored but those other guys kept getting in the way."

Really?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekohr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
81. Elizabeth Warren will be the next Senator from MA
and the Republicans in the Senate will still block ANY appointment to that office, unless we elect 60 loyal Democratic Senators. Now that's a thought!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. Bitch whine piss moan. The MOST progressive legislation by far since LBJ and you bitch and moan. Go
take a med, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. Shouldn't it really be the job of Congress to be introducing progressive bills or just bills at all?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Obama clearly used his executive influence to force blue dogs into watering down his proposals
Because that makes a lot of sense if you don't think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. He did what? Where is your bloody proof? He's forcing them to do their job.
Something most here seems to forget. Obama doesn't make the laws, Congress bloody does. Additionally Obama wants government to work, not end up in a stand still, shit doesn't get done that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Sorry, I was being facetious
Still waiting for an example of Obama using his executive power and influence to single handedly undermine the progressive cause, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I love these unrealistic threads.
Whining around the mulberry bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuddnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Mulberry Bush
Was he the one between Jeb and Neal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. It can be whatever you want it to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Name one he has signed? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Obama's Affordable Health care plan is the most progressive health care bill
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 10:02 PM by pnwmom
we've had since Medicare was passed. No other President succeeded in supporting any health care bill that was as progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. No there were plenty other bills far more progressive.
Including several proposals from republicans. Real republicans. There is almost nothing progressive in the Rent-a-peasant to the Insurance Industry Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. What great republican proposals was congress considering, that Obama nixed with the threat of veto?
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 11:23 PM by killbotfactory
What was the other option between the healthcare reform act as passed and the jack shit status quo for at least another decade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
67. NONE of them got passed! Who cares whether they were more progressive?
The bottom line is this is the first progressive overhaul of the medical system since Medicare. No other President since then has done better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. I care.
It isn't about Team D winning for me, it is about what we win. It is about the policies. This particular policy is nearly indefensible. Note I said "nearly", I have defended and will continue to defend the small parts of it that actually do some good. The bulk of it is a corrupt give-away to the health insurance industry. In total it is a wretched piece of legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. If you care about "what we win" than you should care that no previous President
Edited on Wed Aug-03-11 07:57 AM by pnwmom
won ANYTHING after Medicare was passed.

There are major parts of the bill that will do good. I'm happy for you that your own situation makes you feel that the real improvements in the bill are insignificant. But millions of other people are looking forward to a day when they will FINALLY not be precluded from buying insurance on the basis of a preexisting condition. In the meantime, a high risk pool is available nationwide for those who have been denied insurance; no one will be kicked off an insurance plan because they develop a costly illness or hit a benefit ceiling; and children may remain on their parents' plans until they are 26.

In total it is a good piece of legislation that needs to be improved, just as Medicare was when it began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #69
80. It is a corporatist turd in the punch bowl that could have been passed anytime
but wiser heads rejected similar and even marginally better poison pills.

Doing nothing would have been a big improvement. This turkey is fucking radioactive and fairly fascist in nature. Creating more too big to fail and legally mandating most folks to buy from the company store deserves torches and pitchforks rather than praise.

Calling a bill that maintains an anti-trust exemption progressive is like calling a pig roast vegetarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Since you asked, here's two:
Obama Signs Equal-Pay Legislation: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/us/politics/30ledbetter-web.html
Obama Signs Credit-Card Overhaul Legislation Into Law: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124302235634548041.html

Let's forget the healthcare bill, since that is an obvious corporate giveaway (despite health insurance companies lobbying against it in a machavellian rope-a-dope-move.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Can somebody list all the progressive legislation Obama has fought for?
Like, when he fought hard for single payer?

Or the return of 4th Amendment protections?

Or the end of the Bush tax cuts?



oh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The Affordable Care Act is progressive,
even if it isn't AS progressive as you would have liked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. And he sure "fought" to make sure it was scarcely more "progressive" than that!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yeah, he sure made a lot of phone calls to water-down the proposals he made.
Wait.. that doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. "Wait...that doesn't make sense." You see? We *can* agree!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. If Mitt Romney were even remotely progressive you might have a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. You realize fights can be lost, right?
Even before they start.

http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/11/12/obama-denies-acceptance-bush-tax-cuts

But you see, his public denouncement against the Bush tax cuts just gave him cover to extend the Bush tax cuts under no threat to other items on his agenda from republicans in congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. You realize that taking things "off the table" before negotiating is one way to always lose, right?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. What has he taken off the table?
Since there is no legislation passed by congress worth a damn to progressives that Obama has vetoed, what has he "taken off the table?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. What has Obama taken off the table?
What legislation was congress able to pass that Obama nixed pre-emptively? With a threat of veto perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Wow. Not feigned. "Obama Takes Single Payer Plan “Off the Table”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Yes, because if he didn't do that Congress would have passed single payer!
Scoundrel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. So let's get this straight -- he's a "great leader" because he routinely anticipates failure
...in advance of progressive ideals, so instead starts watering them down -- in advance -- as a "negotiating" "stance" so that what he signs winds up being... fairly conservative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. So you want a president that stands for the right things
even if it means getting nothing done. You want him to uncompromisingly stand up for progressive values by martyring himself at the feet of a corrupt and ruthless political system. You are not alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. "So you want a president that stands for the right things." Yes. Yes I do.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. And when the democrats, nevermind republicans, reject him, what then?
Bash him for lacking "leadership" ability?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #53
63. Ah, but what happens when said leader rejects the Democrats? The ones who voted for him?
Edited on Wed Aug-03-11 01:02 AM by villager
Bashing them for "liberal" tendencies, etc.?

What then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. Then you wake up from the dream, take a breath, and realize that's not reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. "Then you wake up from the dream" Hey! The first part of your reply was actually correct!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
49. The Dream Act is one of them. But you've easily ignored it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think this thread is very disingenious on the impact of a President and his bully pulpit
on Congressional policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Bully pulpit. Explain how that works, exactly.
Also explain why republicans in congress would give a flying fuck, and how that would motivate the populace to turn against them at the polls. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. I should have been more specific.
I was referring to his first 2 years in office. When he had large majorities in the Senate and the House.

As for the definition of the bully pulpit, look it up. Do some research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. The Senate wasn't filibuster proof
And was filled with Blue dogs who side with republicans on issues like healthcare and government spending.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. Obama had a filibuster proof super-majority in the Senate for ONLY 49 DAYS

Since the day that Obama was sworn into office we've had 60 democratic senators in the Senate for a total of ONLY 49 DAYS.

Senator Franken was sworn in July 2009 and Senator Kennedy died August 2009 - that makes a total of only 49 days.
And the majority of those 49 days Senator Kennedy was at home on his death bed.

With all the GOP obstruction it takes 60 yes votes to invoke cloture in order to get almost everything passed in the Senate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #44
57. Unless you use that majority to change the filibusters rules.
Which they didn't.

I wonder why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. I'm sure it was Obama's doing!
Right?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #58
73. Actually it was Reid's doing.
Or not doing, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
54. you mean all of the 48 or was it 49 days of majority? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #31
72. During those 2 years
Speaker Pelosi's House passed a LOT of progressive legislation that never reached the level of up or down vote in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't believe Obamas vetoed anything.
Another sign of weakness. FDR vetoed 300+ peices of legislation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. Of COURSE you would turn this into a negative about the President.
And of course, you couldn't answer the question.

Weak, weak sauce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
37. Basically, I want a solid example of Obama being a shitheel
That doesn't rely on massive ignorance of how our government works and/or his perceived ability to motivate a majority of the 300 million people in our country into pestering congress into giving a fuck about doing the right thing.

I know it's a lot to ask, but please humor me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. I agree.
This is the first presidency in the history of the country where the left didn't get what we wanted. How dare I ask for evidence for Obama's malfeasance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
56. How about what progressive legilsation has Obama threatened to veto
in order to thwart the progressive agenda?

What policy has congress agreed upon passing, which Obama took a look at and said "Oh, hell no, make that shit more friendly to wallstreet and the GOP!" forcing them to become sell outs to the progressive cause?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
59. Congress never passed *single payer healthcare* -- FAIL
Now if you want to be honest -- they (and Obama) put forth the Health Insurance Profit Protection plan. That is NOT progressive - period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. What was stopping congress from passing Single Payer?
Obama's threat of veto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #59
77. "Congress never passed *single payer healthcare*"
that's the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
60. There has been so many back door deals
how can we even know what he vetoed? He had a 'talk' with BIG PHARMA, for Pete's sake, before the 'health bill' was even a gleam in the Congress' eye. Hell, we KNOW that he put SS and Medicare on the table. What else has he done behind closed doors?

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. Was the healthcare situation better or worse before Obama?
Big Pharma owns congresspeople. Of course he talked to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
70. What progressive legislation? Was there something to actually veto? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #70
78. Well, Obama is the bottleneck in this whole process
At least according to his most strident critics.

Just wondering what awesome progressive legislation this congress was willing to pass that Obama watered down. It shouldn't be too hard to find, considering all the vitriol directed at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tweeternik Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
71. K&R ...
sounds like some keyboard warriors here still really don't "get" how this political "game" works! thankfully Obama does!! :think: it's really not that hard to comprehend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
74. Kicked and rec'd
I don't know if this constant state of outrage is ignorance or shit stirring. Some people missed civics class. They need to find a monarch to live in and hope the monarch stays benign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
79. Nah, it is better PR to kill policies in shady backroom deals with the very forces dragging us down.
Obama doesn't get bills he doesn't want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. What progressive legislation was congress about to pass that Obama killed in backroom deals?
I can't wait for all the juicy deatils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC