Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Kennedy later regretted rejecting Nixon’s proposal" (Universal HC)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:30 PM
Original message
"Kennedy later regretted rejecting Nixon’s proposal" (Universal HC)
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 06:37 PM by NJmaverick
History is a great teacher if we are willing to listen:



In fact, the Obama health-reform package Kennedy supported in his last days is similar to one Kennedy helped defeat when proposed by President Richard Nixon. If anything, the Obama plan is more conservative. Nixon would have mandated that all employers offer coverage to their employees, while creating a subsidized government insurance program for all Americans that employer coverage did not reach. It would take a miracle to pass such a plan today—a public insurance plan and an employer mandate are two provisions of the proposals now in Congress that are most in doubt.

But Kennedy helped kill Nixon’s proposal not only because he preferred a government insurance option for everyone, but because he believed it was politically achievable.



President Jimmy Carter did not make health reform a priority, however, and Kennedy later regretted rejecting Nixon’s proposal. “It was a rare moment in his Senate career where he made a fundamental miscalculation about what was politically possible—a lot of liberals did,” says Yale University political scientist and progressive health-reform advocate Jacob Hacker. “What was not recognized by anyone at the time was that this was the end of the New Deal era. What would soon come crashing over them was the tax revolts” that ushered in Ronald Reagan and a conservative, antigovernment philosophy.


http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/08/26/echoes-of-kennedy-s-battle-with-nixon-in-health-care-debate.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. damn...*smh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. Epic Fail. See below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. this country was so liberal in the 70s!
Even Nixon was proposing a health care plan. What happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ronald Reagan nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hileeopnyn8d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is the correct answer. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Reagan helped, but he capitlized on mistakes made by liberals of the 70s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. What liberals of the 70s?
Carter, Ford, or Nixon?

You could argue liberals of the 60s.

The only mistake Carter made was to tell the Americans the truth about the state of the economy. Reagan came in and blamed government for all the world's problems wrapped in an American Flag endorsed by the Christian Right, which used to be the conservatives in the democratic party we had to fight with over giving African Americans equal rights in the 1960s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nixon would be a Left Bagger in 2009 nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Saw this earlier...thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. It was better than the crap they're now trying to sell us
Was that the point of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes President Nixon is to the left of the modern Democratic Party
and that isn't sarcasm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Kinda scary how far we've fallen as a country, isnt it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'd say who I blame but that opens up a flame war
So I'll just keep my mouth shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I'm going to have a little lie-down right now because I think you're onto something. And thinking...
...about your point is making me feel dizzy.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm hoping we don't suffer the same regrets ourselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If we are suffering that regret we are in re-education camps
because the only way the right can get further right is to go full blown fascist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. It's not about the nation being liberal or conservative, it's an issue of control of Congress
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 07:07 PM by NJmaverick
things could get more republican in the very near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The GOP ideology of the 70s is a lot different than the GOP ideology now
You have to remember the 1980 GOP primary and look at the debates and rhetoric of Bush I vs. Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. News video from the early 1970's on the HC debate ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Thanks for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
51. You're welcome and more here ...
"...There have been three cycles of health care reform in the last half century – 1970-73, 1992-1994, and 2007 to date. At the dawn of each cycle, single-payer legislation had already been introduced. But early in the cycle, single-payer legislation was “taken off the table” (to quote a statement Sen. Max Baucus now wishes he had never made). Each time the
http://pnhp.org/blog/2009/08/08/reply-to-critics-of-%e2%80%9cbait-and-switch-how-the-%e2%80%98public-option%e2%80%99-was-sold%e2%80%9d/

"...Democratic leadership chose instead market-based proposals that had no track record and no evidence to support them. Each time they favored reform deemed more “politically feasible” than single-payer because it left the insurance industry in place. In all three cycles, the alternative, market-based proposal was promoted by one or two policy entrepreneurs (that is to say, it wasn’t an idea that bubbled up from the grassroots).

Single-payer legislation was the first out of the chute during the 1970-1973 cycle. In January 1970, Sen. Ted Kennedy introduced what we would today call a single-payer bill. But Kennedy and other leading Democrats quickly abandoned single-payer in favor of a theory about cost containment called the “health maintenance strategy.” This strategy revolved around a new-fangled type of insurance company proposed by a Minnesota physician named Paul Ellwood that Ellwood called the “health maintenance organization.”

Ellwood would become rich and famous selling his HMO idea. He single-handedly convinced President Richard Nixon to endorse legislation to subsidize the formation of HMOs all over the country. While Ellwood worked the Republicans, the AFL-CIO worked the Democrats. Within a year, Kennedy and many other Democrats had been persuaded to abandon the single-payer approach in favor of legislation that would subsidize HMOs. The 1970-1973 cycle ended with the enactment of the HMO Act of 1973. Thus was the world’s first HMO industry born. As we all know now, the HMO experiment failed..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. Nixon's proposal was a lot better than what we're being offered now.
I doubt Kennedy would regret voting "no" on the current, proposed corporate give-away plan.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Those that refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it
and there will be regrets once more when health care reform is left undone for yet another generation.

As for Kennedy, the unreccs show what you guys think of this great man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I do not accept the premise that change will take that long.
The current system is unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Change will come, eventually, UNLESS we pass the disastrous bill that's currently on the table.

California will probably pass single-payer on its own in 2011. All they need is a Democratic Governor. The legislature has already passed the bill. Schwarzenegger vetoed it. Once California has single-payer, most (if not all) states will follow suit.

It's likely that if we pass a new law now, the new law will preempt single-payer, i.e. the Federal law will preempt state law and prevent states from enacting a single-payer system.

THIS is what the health insurance companies fear. THIS is what brought them to the bargaining table. THIS is why they are not fighting Obama's tepid reforms, and THIS is why it is extremely important that we do not pass any health insurance reform bill this year.

Let's not settle for a bail-out of the health insurance industry. Let's insist on the eradication of it. In all likelihood, California will lead the way in 2011 ... if we can just give them time.

Canada got its single-payer system one province at a time. That seems to be the way it will have to happen in the U.S.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I see a problem with your position
you say health care must be reformed because you say they are unsustainable. Yet you say that flaws in the current bill will not be changed, even though the way people talk about those flaws they are equally unsustainable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
45. He wouldn't vote no
Senator Kirk was a close ally of his and he is not voting no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. No doubt about it, Kennedy was a brilliant man who was not going to make the same mistake twice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. The Plum LineGreg Sargent's blog Kennedy Historians: It’s False To Conclude Kennedy Would Have Ditch
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 07:40 PM by Mass
Ditched Public Option For Compromise

People differ on their interpretation of what Kennedy regretted and there does not seem to be any direct quote of Kennedy saying this.

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/bipartisanship/kennedy-historians-its-false-to-conclude-kennedy-would-have-ditched-public-option-for-compromise/

Since Ted Kennedy’s death, it’s been widely asserted that one of his greatest regrets was that he turned down a health care deal with Richard Nixon. Having learned this lesson, goes this line, Kennedy would have wanted Dems to sacrifice mightily for a compromise with Republicans this year on health care — perhaps even giving up the public option.

But several Kennedy historians have now told us in interviews that this is a severe oversimplification of history that shouldn’t lead us to that conclusion at all.
...
t’s true that Nixon and Kennedy negotiated over how to do universal health care — Nixon wanted to do it through private insurers; Kennedy through the government — and that both sides ended up walking away from the table.
...
“Kennedy was sorry that they didn’t reach an agreement” and that both sides “never reached closure,” Clymer told our reporter, Amanda Erickson. He dismissed the idea that Kennedy regretted not giving up enough: “That’s not the same thing at all.”
...
r. Janet Heininger, who interviewed Kennedy extensively for the Kennedy Oral History Project, said the two historical moments — each with different proposals and public moods — are not remotely comparable. She said the parallel is too tortured to conclude much of anything, let alone that the lesson is to “compromise with Republicans now.”

“I don’t think that’s what he would have wanted us to take from it,” she concluded.


In addition, remember that Kennedy, in his last editorial about healthcare written just before he died, said the public option was an important element of bill and that he could not see how it would work without it.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/207406/page/1

To accomplish all of this, we have to cut the costs of health care. For families who've seen health-insurance premiums more than double—from an average of less than $6,000 a year to nearly $13,000 since 1999—one of the most controversial features of reform is one of the most vital. It's been called the "public plan." Despite what its detractors allege, it's not "socialism." It could take a number of different forms. Our bill favors a "community health-insurance option." In short, this means that the federal government would negotiate rates—in keeping with local economic conditions—for a plan that would be offered alongside private insurance options. This will foster competition in pricing and services. It will be a safety net, giving Americans a place to go when they can't find or afford private insurance, and it's critical to holding costs down for everyone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I'm having problems with the way this article presents infomation
it's long on the author's interpretations and short on actual quotes (with proper context).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. So is yours
I don't see one direct quote from Teddy Kennedy in yours either :rofl:

Pwned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I guess a laughing emoticon is what you are passing off as facts these days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. What there is not one quote from Ted Kennedy in your OP
You quote a Yale professor who is speculating as much as the interviewer in the response.

You got pwned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Actually this article is better than yours
Because it actually has a quote from Ted Kennedy

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. more laugh=fact posts, I think you sense that you are on the losing side of the debate
your desperation is quite apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Probably more quotes and context than yours...
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 07:48 PM by Mass
And a very recent quote by Kennedy, at a point when people were already debating whether the public option should be ditched in order to pass the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. More quotes but the interesting thing is that they don't support the interpretations
even with the shortening of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Really. I linked the article, so you can read it, if you want.
But I assume it would be embarrassing to read something that disagrees with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #38
46. Here's the problem. I would have to accept a rediculus scenerio
that Kennedy doesn't regret passing up on a health plan superior to anything that we could get today. Why on earth would I believe people trying to sell me that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. You just owned him
Congrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. LOL! Only in your rather distorted impression of reality
but hey you also believe yourself to be a world class debater, so who am I to rain on your parade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. PWNED
You just got hit with a giant bag of fail, and the worst part of it is, I didn't realize it till you made your comment and I compared the two posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. *yawn*
this sort of behavior gets old fast:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. F-A-I-L
Oh look you used an emoticon

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. No I think he believed what he was selling
Of course, he's worried about the "liberals" of the 70s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Your flame tactics worked Jake, I was distracted for a momement
then I realized I would have to be some sort of fool to believe, even for a second, that Kennedy doesn't regret passing up a health care plan SUPERIOR to anything that could be passed today. I guess you learned the tactics of distraction well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. another discipline of attack and distract
Edited on Sat Dec-19-09 10:13 AM by NJmaverick
your deception even worked for a bit, until I realized your claims that Kennedy didn't regret passing on a great health care plan were beyond ludicris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. What is shameful is that this quote was debunked when Hatch used it in a This Week interview
just after Kennedy's death (with everybody justly protesting), but Democrats are now using it to justify this plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Ah I know you guys prefer emoticons, but just a point of FACT, there was no debunked quote
I didn't post any Kennedy quotes that could be debunked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I never use emoticons, but happy to see you admit you do not have a quote of Kennedy saying that.
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 07:55 PM by Mass
So, you know what Kennedy thought? Note I never said I thought I knew. I only posted people who disagree with you and an actual quote by Kennedy. I cannot read minds. Neither should you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #39
49. Kennedy thought that in hindsight he passed up the best deal he was ever going to see
and he regretted it for the rest of his life. I sure hope we don't see history repeat itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC