|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 09:12 AM Original message |
The DOJ apparently lied, in court, to get DADT reinstated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okasha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. Obama wants those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Is that what the objective is here? 'Cause I've been trying to figure it out for months. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okasha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Well, I'm sure they want the "progressive" homophobes, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muffin1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
34. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. The objective is for President Obama and the Pentagon to implement the Repeal of DADT Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Courts aren't "interfering" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:49 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Your questions are ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I'm asking you a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. Here, let's try again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. that's not lying. That's misunderestimating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. The court last night formally enjoined the military from enforcing any discharges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I sincerely hope that happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
36. That's there JOB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. it looks like they are distinguishing between "discharged" and "approved for discharge" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. You should give this it's own thread. It's rather informative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okasha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I think that's far worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. if these three are the same three, they asked to be discharged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. 'homophobia of this admnistration' ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okasha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I guess you missed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. anyone who defends the Donnie McClurkin's of this world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I haven't seen anyone defending McClurkin on this thread, so who are you accusing of that? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I'm stating an opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 06:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Deleted message |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. No, the DOJ is NOT asking for the stay to remain in place so that the Pentagon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:58 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I don't see why they couldn't do that while a stay on discharges was in place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I think you might be confusing some things here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. you do understand that the statute repealing DADT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 07:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Considering you have posted that 'no anti-discrimination' point to a dozen of my comments... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. and you still haven't given me a response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 08:12 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. And if the 9th Circuit Court lifts the stay ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. If the 9th court lifts the stay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 02:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
39. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
12. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
30. Deleted message |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Since we were in a civil discussion, I don't see what the harm of it was. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fearless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
35. It's clear that the Obama Administration would rather play politics than give us our equal rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. With these people, EVERYTHING is politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnie (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
38. Does it bother anyone else that the military needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC