Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al Gore correctly predicts that Obama's opponents will take his criticism out of context.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:14 PM
Original message
Al Gore correctly predicts that Obama's opponents will take his criticism out of context.
From Gore's article in Rolling Stone ...


First of all, anyone who honestly examines the incredible challenges confronting President Obama when he took office has to feel enormous empathy for him: the Great Recession, with the high unemployment and the enormous public and private indebtedness it produced; two seemingly interminable wars; an intractable political opposition whose true leaders — entertainers masquerading as pundits — openly declared that their objective was to ensure that the new president failed; a badly broken Senate that is almost completely paralyzed by the threat of filibuster and is controlled lock, stock and barrel by the oil and coal industries; a contingent of nominal supporters in Congress who are indentured servants of the same special interests that control most of the Republican Party; and a ferocious, well-financed and dishonest campaign poised to vilify anyone who dares offer leadership for the reduction of global-warming pollution.

In spite of these obstacles, President Obama included significant climate-friendly initiatives in the economic stimulus package he presented to Congress during his first month in office. With the skillful leadership of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and committee chairmen Henry Waxman and Ed Markey, he helped secure passage of a cap-and-trade measure in the House a few months later. He implemented historic improvements in fuel-efficiency standards for automobiles, and instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to move forward on the regulation of global-warming pollution under the Clean Air Act. He appointed many excellent men and women to key positions, and they, in turn, have made hundreds of changes in environmental and energy policy that have helped move the country forward slightly on the climate issue. During his first six months, he clearly articulated the link between environmental security, economic security and national security — making the case that a national commitment to renewable energy could simultaneously reduce unemployment, dependence on foreign oil and vulnerability to the disruption of oil markets dominated by the Persian Gulf reserves. And more recently, as the issue of long-term debt has forced discussion of new revenue, he proposed the elimination of unnecessary and expensive subsidies for oil and gas.


SNIP


All that might be completely understandable and make perfect sense in a world where the climate crisis wasn't "real." Those of us who support and admire President Obama understand how difficult the politics of this issue are in the context of the massive opposition to doing anything at all — or even to recognizing that there is a crisis. And assuming that the Republicans come to their senses and avoid nominating a clown, his re-election is likely to involve a hard-fought battle with high stakes for the country. All of his supporters understand that it would be self-defeating to weaken Obama and heighten the risk of another step backward. Even writing an article like this one carries risks; opponents of the president will excerpt the criticism and strip it of context.


emphasis mine ...

Exhibit A
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4892387

Full Rolling Stone article: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/climate-of-denial-20110622
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excerpt criticism stripped of context?
That certainly never would happen on DU, would it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Na, never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just think where we'd be if our corrupt court hadn't installed Bush in the WH...
I'm glad Gore is speaking out. It's great that the admin. has made changes it could without Congressional action - however, with Obama's great gifts of intellect and language, he could really LEAD on this issue and put to rest the idea that climate change deniers are to be taken seriously, and ask for the people's support as we REALLY tackle this problem. imo he is way too concerned with upsetting big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Or if Nader hadn't played spoiler, allowing for the recount to happen at all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Or if 200k Dems in Florida hadn't voted for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Shh, you're not supposed to mention that!
The correct response is "Nader Nader Nader booga booga Palin Palin!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Sorry! I let it slip again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very long and interesting
article. Here's the part that will get very little mention.

<...>

First of all, anyone who honestly examines the incredible challenges confronting President Obama when he took office has to feel enormous empathy for him: the Great Recession, with the high unemployment and the enormous public and private indebtedness it produced; two seemingly interminable wars; an intractable political opposition whose true leaders — entertainers masquerading as pundits — openly declared that their objective was to ensure that the new president failed; a badly broken Senate that is almost completely paralyzed by the threat of filibuster and is controlled lock, stock and barrel by the oil and coal industries; a contingent of nominal supporters in Congress who are indentured servants of the same special interests that control most of the Republican Party; and a ferocious, well-financed and dishonest campaign poised to vilify anyone who dares offer leadership for the reduction of global-warming pollution.

In spite of these obstacles, President Obama included significant climate-friendly initiatives in the economic stimulus package he presented to Congress during his first month in office. With the skillful leadership of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and committee chairmen Henry Waxman and Ed Markey, he helped secure passage of a cap-and-trade measure in the House a few months later. He implemented historic improvements in fuel-efficiency standards for automobiles, and instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to move forward on the regulation of global-warming pollution under the Clean Air Act. He appointed many excellent men and women to key positions, and they, in turn, have made hundreds of changes in environmental and energy policy that have helped move the country forward slightly on the climate issue. During his first six months, he clearly articulated the link between environmental security, economic security and national security — making the case that a national commitment to renewable energy could simultaneously reduce unemployment, dependence on foreign oil and vulnerability to the disruption of oil markets dominated by the Persian Gulf reserves. And more recently, as the issue of long-term debt has forced discussion of new revenue, he proposed the elimination of unnecessary and expensive subsidies for oil and gas.

<...>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you for pointing out what should be obvious.....
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I think Gore gives a very balanced critique ... good and bad.
But OPs titled "Gore has both praise and criticism for Obama ..." won't get the outrage machine running on all cylinders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks.
K & R :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R. Great read.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. The sad thing is when he wrote that line he wasn't talking about Obama's opponents on the right
Very good catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. To be fair ... some one else posted the short quote in a different thread before I saw it.
The really ironic part is that if you read the whole article, Gore gives Obama credit in a number of areas. I think Gore takes a pretty balanced look at it. Including the criticism.

But what happens here on DU ... and on CNN ... and probably everywhere else ... "Gore blasts Obama".

The manufactured outrage machine runs 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unfortunately, Mr. Gore, I think the concept of "self-defeating"
is slow to be realized by some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. The entire Rolling Stone essay is well worth the read to get a proper perspective.
Edited on Wed Jun-22-11 02:14 PM by Uncle Joe
There is legitimate criticism of the Obama Administration, the corporate media, the Republicans and the fossil fuel industry.

Edit for P.S. And the timidity of Democrats in the Congress.

Thanks for the thread, JoePhilly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC