Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now Goolsbee is leaving, wTF is going on?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
BernieSandersIsGod Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:26 PM
Original message
Now Goolsbee is leaving, wTF is going on?
He was the only one that was able to display a bit of confidence when discussing economic policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe he's become less confident?
Dunno, more than likely he really just wanted to get back to family and a little bit of normalcy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. He was on leave from the University of Chicago...
And needed to get back to prevent losing his tenure.

"Goolsbee has been on leave for four years from the university’s Booth School of Business and could have lost his tenured position at Chicago, where he was a professor for 14 years before joining the administration, if he did not return, an official said."

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56373.html#ixzz1OaKvsA3M

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Get it right: lefties HATE Goolsbee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Did I miss that memo? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. He didn't sound exactly confident on Sunday morning (6/5/11) - 5 million-plus vacant homes.
Where are all these families living today?

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1106/05/sotu.01.html?du

CROWLEY: Let me move you to the housing market. As you know, some people say a recovery never starred. other people say it is it in a double-dip. What we do know is home value is down 4.2 percent in the first quarter of this year. Now they're down to 2002 levels, I think? Home values? So sort of a decade of equity is gone for Americans owning a home.

Do you think it is time maybe to reinstate your first-time home buyers program? Is there anything you need to do, because the economy can't really recover, can it, in the strength that you need it to recover if the housing market is so bad?

GOOLSBEE: Well, you know, I'd say there are really two different questions embodied in that question. Housing is important. It's clear we got into a housing bubble and we got substantial numbers of people into houses that they could not afford. And so in addition to the recession, we're dealing with an excess 5 million-plus vacant homes in the country.

So it's been a tough struggle and slog in the housing market. And it is likely to remain so because you have these vacant homes.

Now...

CROWLEY: Can the economy improve?

GOOLSBEE: So, number one -- so on the -- can the economy improve, I think it can. I think the mistake -- it would be a mistake to try to roll back the clock and go back to the expansion of the 2000s which was driven almost exclusively by excessive consumer spending and residential housing construction. Those can be important, but they should not be the sole drivers the way they were in the 2000s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. So. Construction, in his mind, will not be a driving factor
in restoring the economy. I think it usually has been in the past.

Alrighty then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Construction won't be because it CAN'T be
Not with the huge glut of foreclosures driving prices down. Too much supply to have any demand for new construction.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Right.
You would think tho that there would some plan for removing the glut so things could start moving again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marblehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. gettin out while the gettin's good..
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 09:56 PM by Marblehead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Oooh...sad, but maybe true
Any objective spectator must be having problems with this: there is no buying power to sustain the economy, and that's what our economy is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. The employment numbers are dismal...
...and most signs point to another downturn. He's getting out while he can, IMO.

Obama better brace himself. If the economy does what it looks like it's going to do, he'll get the blame. He can't call it the Bush economy any longer. Too bad he let the Republicans dictate the shape of the stimulus package, back when we had majorities in both houses of Congress and Obama had a mandate for change. But no, he had to be Mr. Appeasement and let half the stimulus be pissed away on tax breaks, the most ineffective form of stimulus.

How's that bipartisanship thing working out for you, Mr. President? You know those Republicans, those people you continually bent over backwards to please? They're still busy laying land mines, because the LAST THING they want is a recovery. They want it to be so dismal that people will vote for them out of spite.

And you're still trying to set a different tone.

What a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. well, the next prez will benefit from the money in corporate america being
freed up AFTER he is out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes indeed...
...that is one of the land mines I referred to: the right wing corporate honchos sitting on piles of money and not investing and not creating jobs, because they want to make Obama look as bad as possible. The worse the economy does, the fewer jobs there are, the worse he looks. If the rest of us have to suffer, oh well ain't that a shame. They don't give a rat's ass about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Then they'll throw us crumbs and tell us to be happy. Oh look, DWTS is on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The numbers are bad enough, do they have to put "unexpectedly" in front of them?
They use that term as if everyone is clueless and expecting rainbows and unicorns. They only people that end up looking naive is the Admin. Prepare the people for hard times and bad news but don't look deer in the headlights surprised when it hits the fan. Half of the jobs created in the recent report were by McD and everyone knew it 2 weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's because he'd lose his tenure at the university if he didn't go back.
After the WH---he still needs or wants his job. And starting over is a problem. Anyway I don't see the big deal. However, I can see people making this a referendum on the Obama admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. By this time in many administrations, there are people that leave.
Some want to go back to their normal lives. Its not unusual in the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. Goolsbee is no doubt a brilliant guy but he has made some less than impressive public appearances..
in the past. Not sure, but maybe something he said on the recent Sunday talk show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. Isn't there usually turnover in most top jobs to the Presidency
after 3 years or so? I don't find it that odd. The stress factors are enormous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC