Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Napolitano: Obama killed bin Laden on an illegal whim...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:23 PM
Original message
Napolitano: Obama killed bin Laden on an illegal whim...
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201105020014

Let's see the Republicans push this narrative. I'd love for them to try to impeach Pres. Obama over killing the man responsible for the death of nearly 3,000 Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. say what?
huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. At first I thought this was about Janet Napolitano and I was thinking she had lost it
Glad that it was just some bitter old Fox News loser. No surprise they would even take it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's what I'd thought, too. Never heard of this assclown before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. That's what I thought, too
Edited on Mon May-02-11 10:46 PM by bigwillq
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL. I'm sorry but there really ARE some arguments the American people won't buy.
I mean, don't get me wrong, this country can get sold on a lot of stupid shit, but I don't think this is one of them. In the eyes of many, this is up there with getting Hitler. Of course there are debateable points there, but its definately in the same ball park either way. This is just desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Killing the main target after ten years of warfare is an "illegal whim"?
Wasn't it the whole fucking point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lob1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's the same idiot who thought the Iraq war was an
illegal whim. Oh wait, no he wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Actually, Anfrew Napolitano is an antiwar & libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Looks like he's objectively pro-Bin Laden.
Just borrowing a little rhetoric from the Iraq war sales pitch. :evilgrin:

Today we saw the hypocrisy of the right on full display. These guys lack any sense of irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why do they hate America so much?
Republican=pro-terrorist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. OBL is dead, and the rw wackos cry about it. There is alot of reading over at Media Matters of
their jealous rants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. Napalitano: Great ice cream, lousy analyst
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. Napolitano is actually one of the few reasonable fox personalities
Yes, he's said some incredibly stupid stuff in the past. But he's been 100% consistent on respect for due process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. He's a Fox personality for a good reason
and not a Supreme Court Justice.

Hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Regardless, he's been very very consistant on this issue, so I think the OP is a little misleading
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. He is nalso not an expert in any way on international law in regards to
military action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. That doesn't mean he has an agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. No, it means he's talking out his ass.
His opinions on such matters are meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. Andrew Napolitano, not Janet. The headline is unclear. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah, 'cause that's what happens when the WH runs out of his favorite beer.
Good think they still had some pie or he might have gone nuclear on North Korea. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. Pfft, I've seen that narrative pushed here.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. LUNATICS /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. Completely legal:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. Screw him...
We all know what his reaction would be if Bushie would have done it.

Hey Republicans, our President eliminated your boogeyman...get the hell over it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Ahem, as I mentioned up above, he's been 100% consistent on the issue of due process
Edited on Tue May-03-11 12:03 PM by Very_Boring_Name
Even when Bush president. He was against the patriot act, and against wireless wiretapping, for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. How was it allegedly illegal? In what way? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC