Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Giving New Meaning To The Phrase 'Dim Bulb'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:15 AM
Original message
Giving New Meaning To The Phrase 'Dim Bulb'
Posted in its entirety w/permission from the author.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2011_02/027858.php

GIVING NEW MEANING TO THE PHRASE 'DIM BULB'.... The right finds the strangest things to get worked up about. Take light bulbs, for example.

In 2007, Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and congressional Democrats worked on an energy bill, which included advanced light-bulb standards, intended to spur innovation, lower costs, and improve energy efficiency. The provision was approved with bipartisan support, and the larger legislation was easily passed and signed by President Bush.

The effort was a great success. Republicans have now decided they don't care.

One of the leading Republicans in Congress, Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI), appeared on the G. Gordon Liddy Show and discussed this notion of an "innovation economy." After Liddy peddled the ludicrous claim that House Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) had implemented a ban on incandescent light bulbs in the United States, McCotter used the opportunity to scoff at liberal efforts to improve the incandescent light bulb, a product that was first invented over 200 years ago. He called the irony "striking" that liberals would "prais{e} the end of the incandescent bulb at the very time they're talking about an innovation economy."


If this sounds dumb, you should listen to the exchange to appreciate just how dim these bulbs really are.

Liddy asked if McCotter could help "get our light bulbs back." The Republican lawmaker said he could, adding, "I saw that some on the left were praising the end of the incandescent bulb, at the very time they're talking about an innovation economy. The irony is striking."

In Grown-Up Land, that's not what "irony" means. When the left talks about "innovation," the point is to emphasize new technologies that can advance national interests. When Democrats look forward on energy policy, and move past an inefficient, 200-year-old light bulb design, there's nothing "ironic" about it. McCotter has it backwards.

By the way, who's Thaddeus McCotter? He's the guy Republicans recently made the chairman of the House GOP conference -- a top leadership post -- who, just last week, threw his support to the Mubarak regime in Egypt.

Regardless, the larger point is worth keeping in mind, because it keeps coming up -- while some policymakers focus on how to improve American competitiveness in the 21st century, a few too many Republicans have their eyes on the 19th century.


—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Surprised they aren't calling for a return to oil lamps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Then whaling... the original fuel source.
Ah, the good old days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Actually if we used vegetable oil... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Whale here, whale now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. 200 years old? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank you.
I was going to say the same thing. In what alternate universe was the light bulb invented circa 1811?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not invented
It was designed! Just took a few more decades to get it to work:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I think Lewis and Clark discovered it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I thought Moses invented it to guide the Israelites in the night...
on their trek to the Promised Land. I recall someone hearing, "last Israelite out of Egypt, make sure you shut off the lights!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. The first recorded use of a filiment to produce light was in 1802.
It took another roughly 75 years to design one that produced enough light and lasted long enough to make it a practical light source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rolling my eyes and shaking my head Rcommendation #5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. "...appeared on the G. Gordon Liddy Show" Anyone that appears on that show
is instantly discredited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Edison did not invent the incandescent light bulb...
he found the way to make it practical for marketing, which heavily involved his staff, (turned out that carbonized cotton fiber in a vacuum was the initial answer and that required refinement). This was in 1879, and a patent was granted in 1880...some 62 years after this genius figured it was.

Another misinformed GOP clown...the RWnut Tree...it just keeps on giving...:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. k n r 7....awesome post....GOPers are self destructing with them winners....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC