Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kirk does not support climate cap and trade because of Gore's personal problems???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:19 PM
Original message
Kirk does not support climate cap and trade because of Gore's personal problems???
I guess they just dont know what excuse to invent?

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2011_02/027813.php

QUOTE OF THE DAY.... In June 2009, then-Rep. Mark Kirk (R) of Illinois was one of just eight House Republicans to break party ranks and support the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES), which included a cap-and-trade system. Exactly one month later, Kirk, fearing a primary loss as he ran for the Senate, reversed course and announced his opposition to the bill he'd just supported.

Kirk, whose reputation for borderline-pathological dishonesty is well deserved, has struggled ever since to explain why he was for combating the climate crisis before he was against it. Apparently, the freshman senator has came up with a new excuse. As Bradford Plumer summarized, "It was Gore's fault!"

Another Republican blasted from both sides of the spectrum for his record on emissions, Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois, said he is "not terribly concerned" about taking heat from green groups for his criticism of EPA action on carbon emissions.

"The consensus behind the climate change bill collapsed and then further deteriorated with the personal and political collapse of Vice President Gore," Kirk said in a brief interview last week.


Hmm. When first asked to explain why he voted for a climate a bill -- which was the right call, by the way -- Kirk said it would help "the narrow interests" of his district, but not Illinois overall. Later, he adopted a new line, saying he voted for a massive energy bill after an extensive debate "out of ignorance" and "a lack of understanding" about how the U.S. economy operates. (This was intended to be Kirk defending his own record.)

Now, apparently, Kirk has a third explanation -- and it has something to do with Al Gore's personal life, as if this is somehow relevant.

I'll never fully understand what in the world voters in Illinois were thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. what personal and political collapse of VP Gore?
I know he's separated from his wife, but so are millions of other people. He and Tipper are probably happier. Not something I'd call a personal collapse.

As for that political collapse, that wasn't Gore's fault. We have the Supreme court to thank for that.

Sigh! What is wrong with these people?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC