Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic Party Issues Statement After Elected Officials Switch Parties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 05:53 PM
Original message
Democratic Party Issues Statement After Elected Officials Switch Parties
The Alabama Democratic Party Tuesday lambasted nine elected Democratic officials in Covington and Tuscaloosa counties for ignoring the will of the voters by switching to the Republican Party.

It is the personal prerogative of local elected officials to join any political party they wish. Yet the crucial question in yesterday's party switches in Tuscaloosa and Covington counties is whether the voters of these counties have been fairly treated. For each office on the ballot in these nine cases, the voters chose Democrats to serve the interests of their families and communities, not Republicans.

Newly-elected Alabama Democratic Party Chairman Mark Kennedy said, “These new Republicans won their seats with significant help and sacrifice from local Democrats, and Alabama Democrats will provide significant help and sacrifice to the nominees we will field in each of these nine future elections."

These party switchers have subverted the will of the voters. These were not acts of integrity as some claim, but selfish acts of self-interest. Three of these newly-minted Republicans were just re-elected as Democrats just three months ago, and if they were interested in serving the people they would have resigned their offices and stood for election as Republicans. Giving voters a choice rather than forcing them to be represented by members of a party whose nominees they have continually rejected would have been the honorable thing to do.


http://www.wncftv.com/localnews/Democratic-Party-Issues-Statement-After-9-Switch-Parties-115049074.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Further proof: Republicons do not do honor
at all.

That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. dudes it's called being bipartisan, recommended by the dems highest leaders dont you know? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think President Obama (I assume that's who you're referring to)
endorses party-switching (which is hardly considered "bipartisanship")- unless we all missed something? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Must be why he contined to support Lieberman.
And Arlen Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. They became (or caucused) with the Democratic Majority
Those were IMHO pretty unique circumstances. I don't think that he wants to see Democrats jump ship and become Republicans though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. You didn't miss anything.
Some just want to blame the President for everything.

Let's wait and see about this massive storm...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Huh?
That makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Man, you're pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. It was a shitty thing to do but in AL there's very little difference between the parties.
It's like the difference between Eisenhower repubs and Reagan repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I would dare to say that many of those former Dems are probably
more conservative then the Repubs in Connecticut, where I live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. The last of the southern Democrats are fading away...
Democrats were losing the south for quite awhile but had managed to hold on to many of the state legislative seats. The past election cycle was a wipe out on a massive scale. We lost hundreds of state legislative seats and Democrats have been switching to the Republican party since. I think we are now well over 700 state legislative seats lost including the 2010 elections and subsequent party switchers.

The House and Senate losses were bad, but the crushing defeat on the state legislative level is where the real disaster was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. they should be made to pay back the money for their campaigns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. recall them and hold a special election to replace them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. Is it just me or doesn't this sound like a set up?
Like this plan was set up to undermine not only the Democratic party but also Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Nah. It's the same thing that often happens after "wave" elections.
Take a look at early 1995. There was lots of party switching going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC