Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time Magazine Cover of Obama: Why Obama Hearts Reagan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:09 PM
Original message
Time Magazine Cover of Obama: Why Obama Hearts Reagan
Edited on Thu Jan-27-11 06:12 PM by Cali_Democrat


http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2044579,00.html


The Role Model: What Obama Sees in Reagan
By Michael Scherer and Michael Duffy




In May 2010, Barack Obama invited a small group of presidential historians to the White House for a working supper in the Family Dining Room. It was the second time he'd had the group in since taking office, and as he sat down across the table from his wife Michelle, the President pressed his guests for lessons from his predecessors. But as the conversation progressed, it became clear to several in the room that Obama seemed less interested in talking about Lincoln's team of rivals or Kennedy's Camelot than the accomplishments of an amiable conservative named Ronald Reagan, who had sparked a revolution three decades earlier when he arrived in the Oval Office.

<snip>

When Obama stood before Congress, the Cabinet and the American people to deliver his second State of the Union address, both the Reagan persona and policies put in appearances. He proposed a freeze in discretionary spending and federal salaries, a push to simplify the tax code and billions in cuts to the defense budget, and he made new calls for a bipartisan effort to repair Social Security. Each of these had been proposed before by another third-year President coming off a midterm defeat in a period of high unemployment.

<snip>

Since the November elections, Obama has brought corporate executives into the White House, reached out to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and made compromise his new watchword. He signed a surprise $858 billion tax cut that would have made Reagan weep with joy and huddled with Reagan's former White House chief of staff Ken Duberstein for lessons learned when the Gipper governed amid economic troubles.Over the Christmas break, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs tweeted that Obama was reading a Reagan biography, and just to confirm the bond, Obama recently wrote an homage to Reagan for USA Today. "Reagan recognized the American people's hunger for accountability and change," Obama wrote, conferring on Reagan two of his most cherished political slogans.

<snip>

Obama's affection for Reagan's political style carries with it a clear self-interest. White House aides gaze fondly at the arc of the Reagan presidency in part because they pray Obama's will mirror it.

Read more...http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2044579,00.html


And David Axelrod has the nerve to say Obama is a Progressive x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I want that picture on a t-shirt!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Me too!
:rofl: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it makes you feel any better
I'm sure the conservatives will be just as enraged by this cover as our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The full article is pretty interesting. OP's excerpts are kind of misleading.
It isn't about how "Obama is just like Reagan". Nor is it that "Obama Admires Reagan's Policies" which he doesn't. It has more to do with using Reagan's style to counter R meme that "government is the problem"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Surprise surprise!
Not really. Of COURSE the latest faux outrage is based on misleading excerpts. Obama spoke of his admiration of Reagan's style since the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. It's funny how most here have forgotten how to read.
but then again comprehension is not everyone's cup of tea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
40. I'm not going to counter your point
I'm just going to make some snide little comment or insult your intelligence in some other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
39. Countering the meme that government is the problem?
By stating that government regulations get in the way of businesses ability to create jobs and need to be done away with.

By stating that Social Security needs to be "repaired," even though everyone who knows math can see that SS is solvent and we just need to ask the rich to finally start putting their fair share of the costs.

By giving tax breaks to the rich --taking money away from the government and giving it to "the job creators" (who haven't created a job in a decade of these fantastic tax cuts).

By "reforming" banks so that they can continue each and every bad practice that *caused* the economic collapse in the first place.

Yeah, he's taking away all the Republican talking points --and making them his official policies. Good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm wondering if part of this is a little che....early campaigning ploy
to make right leaning Inds like him more. Just speculating but I still wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. You skipped the part where it says he loathes the Reagan ideology
and only admires the style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Obama's actions speak louder than words
Free trade agreements as well as Reaganesque tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires suggests that Obama supports Reagan's ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Did you read the full article?
Edited on Thu Jan-27-11 06:28 PM by emulatorloo
Because it doesn't support your narrative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. obama's actions support the narrative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. did you read the full article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. I didn't respond because I obviously read the whole article
I don't post articles unless I read the whole article, sweetie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. i don't need to read the full fucking article..
i saw obama, with my own two eyes, endorse supply-side economics when he stated that the obama/bush tax cuts to the wealthiest americans will create jobs. serial wtf?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
53. politics doesn't happen in a vacuum, he converted what would happen into
a concession where other legislation got passed and the dynamics changed. It sucks, but if we can't think and operate in reality, we no better than the teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. Tax cuts that he swallowed for the sake of helping millions of unemployed people,
ending DADT, and getting START ratified.

He has said repeatedly that he didn't like the tax cuts and doesn't think they'll do a thing to stimulate the economy or create jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
41. Obama swallowed alright
Edited on Fri Jan-28-11 07:56 AM by txlibdem
Trickle Down: doesn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. like supply-side economics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
44. Reagan's style was to ignore reality and sell the American
people a future that didn't exist and we couldn't afford.

Obama is the heir to the destruction that Reagan initiated.

I have no understanding of why he would lionize the man in any way, shape, or form.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. We knew this since the primaries. Did you vote for Obama? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Perhaps you should see my posting history in 2008
I voted for him in the primary and general election. I also donated $250 to his campaign and worked the phone banks in the fall of 2008. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Then you should KNOW better. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. When I voted for him...
Edited on Thu Jan-27-11 06:51 PM by Cali_Democrat
I didn't think he would extend the tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires. He said he wouldn't sign a bill that extends the tax cuts and he did. He did not live up to his promise.

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. He didn't have the votes. But what does that have to do with your OP? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I said Obama talked about his admiration of Reagan's style since the primaries
which is why I questioned if you voted for him, because your OP is about Obama "heart"ing Reagan as the magazine cover shows. What does the fact that he didn't have the votes to pass tax cuts for only the lower 98% have to do with anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Reagan's biggest policy achievement was his tax cuts for the wealthy
Edited on Thu Jan-27-11 07:21 PM by Cali_Democrat
And Obama supports this. If you look at a chart, you will see that this policy ushered in the modern era of high deficits:



Decreased revenue will lead to increased deficits. Obama has chosen to continue this policy. You can say he had no choice, but I believe otherwise. Living up to his campaign promise of letting the tax cuts expire would have been the best thing to do. Now he owns the deficit.

Not only does Obama like Reagan's "style", he also supports many of his policies from tax cuts to deregulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. NO he doesn't! Did you watch his SOTU Tuesday? He said those tax cuts have to end
Edited on Thu Jan-27-11 07:45 PM by jenmito
when they expire. As you must know, he campaigned AGAINST tax cuts for the rich not only during the campaign, but all the way up to the midterms when the Dems. got "shellacked" and refused to pass tax cuts only for those making $250,000 or less. His admiration does NOT extend to his policies. :eyes:

ETA: The author of that article said tonight on Hardball that Obama wants to move the country to the left the way Reagan moved it to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. they were due to expire!
but obama's gonna go to the mat this time, by golly, to ensure they will expire. and during a presidential election year, no less! fuggin hilarious!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. As were those for the "lower" 98% of us! And the FACT is there were not enough Dem. votes
in the Senate to extend the cuts only for the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. and you think those votes will be there in 2012?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Yes. Nearly 2 years in politics is a lifetime and a half. Enough time will have passed that
the Dems. (and some Repubs.) will realize that the tax cuts for the rich did nothing but put us deeper in debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Didnt have the votes?
What votes? Sorry, that tired cliche fails miserably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It's not a "cliche." It's reality. Conservadems voted with Repubs. to vote against
tax cuts for the lower 98% only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #24
38. Its a cliche
We heard it for a decade from the sissified Democrats in congress. Its an excuse for doing nothing.

No matter, Obama needed no votes to let the damaging RW tax cuts die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. At least now you're putting the blame now where it belongs-on the "sissified Dems. in congress." n/t
If Obama let the tax cuts die, that would include those for the 98% of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. hmmm
"Reagan recognized the American people's hunger for accountability and change," Obama wrote

actually, reagan recognized the American people's hunger for denial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. a lot of people went hungry during the glorious reagan years..
reagan didn't recognize jack fucking shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. Don't forget the mentally ill that got kicked out onto the streets by Reagan
"Compassionate Conservative?" Oxymoron.

Obama has adopted Reagan's failed ideas that trickle down works. That is a fact. Obama has bailed out every company in the land. Where is the bailout for the millions of Americans who are losing their homes? Where is the bailout for the 8 million who lost good paying jobs thanks to trickle down economics and a twisted ideology that said that government regulations need to be stopped.

The apologists on DU need to wake up and smell the coffee. The President is no friend of yours, nor mine. He is a friend of big business and now is a friend of deregulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. I find Obama's statements on Reagan disturbing
on so many levels that I hardly know where to start...



you don't say nice things about the guy, afaic

EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
52. Reagan was a disaster
took us down the path of deficits and militarization -- the two worst trends of the last 30 years. If anything, Obama ought to be condemning him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes, Americas first black president loves one of the most racist presidents in US history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeyserSoze87 Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
28. Obama is the Democrat version of Ronald Reagan.
He will get reelected in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Well I guess if Time says it it must be true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
31. Nancy worked HARD to get her boy-toy into the White House...
.... and who are you to try and stop her final effort at taking over the world!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. rofl!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
51. I guess Obama wants to embrace reaganism so he can kill it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
54. Obama has been compared to a
few Presidents. He's Bush, JFK, Reagan and...

The Obama-Lincoln Parallel: A Closer Look

It must have been fun to do the Photoshop cover.

Wheee!

Obama and Reagan have about as much in common as Clinton and Nixon.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
55. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC