Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting discussion / definition of bigotry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:07 AM
Original message
Interesting discussion / definition of bigotry
http://opluso.blogspot.com/2011/01/obamas-opportunistic-bigotry.html

The Obama Administration has filed an appeals court brief defending the odious "Defense of Marriage Act" . This was in response to a lower court's finding that DOMA unconstitutionally discriminated against gays and lesbians.

President Obama, through his Department of Justice lawyers, makes three basic arguments to defend this law that expressly creates two separate but unequal classes of citizens in America. First, he argues that Congress has a right to hide behind historical bigotry (preserve the national status quo), regardless of the consequences on individual citizens. Second, he argues that Congress has a right to be lazy when presented with more than one option and, therefore, doesn't need to even try to respect advances in individual civil rights that arise in some, but not all, states. And, third, he argues that Congress has the right to apply a lowest common denominator analysis when it comes to protecting the constitutional rights and liberties of individual citizens whenever the states disagree -- that is, Congress can arbitrarily waive the federal constitutional protections of specific individuals and follow the lead of the most bigoted state laws.

There are two kinds of bigotry. The first kind (we will call it "Type A") is based upon the ignorance -- often willful -- of the bigot. This individual believes what s/he believes and no amount of contrary evidence or argument will change this individual's mind. The second kind of bigotry (we will call it "Type O") is displayed by President Obama and most other national politicians. These individuals actually are aware that their stated position is bigoted. They typically admit that their position is wrong in private and they rarely display this bigotry in personal relationships. They only profess their bigotry in public order to gain the support (or ameliorate the opposition) of the Type A bigots.

President Obama, who formerly advocated in favor of gay marriage, has taken the side of the bigots in banning recognition of gay marriage because he wants to be re-elected in 2012. No doubt, his personal "struggle" with this issue will resolve itself in favor of marriage equality once he can no longer run for office.

President Obama's defense of the Defense of Marriage Act reminds me of the old joke: "Q: What's the difference between being black and being gay? A: If you tell your mother that you are black, she will still love you." As everyone knows, President Obama's mother was white, his father was black. This background gave him an incredibly sensitive and nuanced understanding of racial bigotry. Obama also taught constitutional law at one of the best law schools in the country. So we can assume he is aware of the Fourteenth Amendment ( "no state shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws"). Unfortunately, Obama grew up to be a politician.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not a bigot. But being a politician is a life-style choice with serious consequences. They shouldn't be allowed to teach. We should pass laws to protect our children from exposure to these people. And for god's sake don't let them get married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is the author saying that President Obama is a bigot?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What would you call a person
who believes a segment of society should have civil unions (robust or not) and not marriage equality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC