I was looking at Republican plans to cut spending without touching Social Security, Medicare, defense, etc., and
ran across this:
Cutting non-security discretionary funds by $100 billion means a 21% annual reduction in the part of the budget that includes funding for education, health and human services and housing and urban development, among other things, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank.
In other words, the sacred cows of domestic Democratic policy.
Ahem. Let’s look at the budget for the
biggest of these agencies (pdf), HHS. About half of that budget goes for the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health. I didn’t think that preventing epidemics was a “Democratic” sacred cow; and despite the anti-science tendencies of the right, I don’t think they’re against medical research in general.
The point is that even within non-security discretionary spending, there’s not a whole lot that you can characterize as wimpy liberal do-goodism. To get anything like the kind of spending cuts the GOP proposes — let alone the much larger cuts that would be needed to do anything serious about budget deficits — you’d have do a lot more than annoy liberals.
And you know what? It’s not going to happen.
It's going to be interesting to watch Republicans maneuver as they attempt to carry out their threats.