Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pres. Obama's biggest mistake was putting free-marketeers and banksters like . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:49 AM
Original message
Pres. Obama's biggest mistake was putting free-marketeers and banksters like . . .
. . . Summers and Geightner in charge of the economy in the first place.

"Chicago School" economics and "democratic values" (small "d" AND big "D") are mutually exclusive ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did Summers and Geithner attend the Chicago School of Economics?
Cause I don't think so!

If they had, I don't think we would have gotten a $800 Billion Stimulus package straight out of the gate.

Your biggest mistake is judging too quickly things that are over your head.
The biggest financial meltdown since the Great Depression wasn't gonna be fixed
in 10 months, no matter if FDR would have come back and did his thing!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. What exactly is "Chicago School" of economics?
I haven't heard this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. from wikipedia:
<snip>
The "Chicago School" is perhaps one of the better known American "schools" of economics. In its strictest sense, the "Chicago School" refers to the approach of the members of the Department of Economics at the University of Chicago over the past century. In a looser sense, the term "Chicago School" is associated with a particular brand of economics which adheres strictly to Neoclassical price theory in its economic analysis, "free market" libertarianism in much of its policy work and a methodology which is relatively averse to too much mathematical formalism and willing to forgo careful general equilibrium reasoning in favor of more results-oriented partial equilibrium analysis. The Chicago school is associated with neoclassical price theory and libertarianism in its support of lower taxation and private sector regulation, but differs from pure free-market economics in its support of government-regulated monetary policy.
</snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. There is such a thing, and they are conservative in their philosophy.....
but the only thing that it has in common with Obama is that he's from Chicago and taught constitution law at the school....but totally different departments/schools. Kind of like comparing Harvard Medical School and JFK Law school at Harvard.

Background on that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_school_of_economics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. You should read "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein . . .
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 01:54 AM by Krashkopf
She does a great job documenting the how time, and time again, "Chicago School" economics have thwarted (often violently) true democratic movements around the world with its radical free market capitalism.

Lawrence Summers, who is currently Director of the White House's National Economic Council for President Obama, was one of the "Chicago Boys" who helped oversee the "economic shock therapy" - rapid privatization and complete deregulation - administered by the IMF and the World Bank on the former Soviet Union.

As it always does, laissez faire capitalism in the Russia, led to the economic destruction of the middle class, and the rise of a very small, very rich, class of elites, who, in modern day Russia are called "the Oligarchs."

And THAT is one of Obama's top economic advisers. I don't think that is the kind of change most Americans had in mind when they voted for Obama in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Second that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. and second your second--a very important and eye-opening book
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 02:29 AM by abq e streeter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bullshit
Letting Cheney walk around free is his biggest mistake.

He turned the economy around, for now. That's about the only thing he's got right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The Chicago boys may have turned Wall Street around for now
but what have they done for the real economy? for jobs, education, healthcare costs, etc? that has yet to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The Chicago Boys have done what they ALWAYS do . . .
they have enriched themselves and screwed everyone else.

Again, I don't think THAT was the CHANGE most Americans were HOPING for back in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Turned the economy around for now is premature to be kind about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Disagree
The economy has not turned around. Unemployment numbers are being so blatantly manipulated so as to be worse than useless. GDP increases have been the result of more falsification and due solely to government spending and inventory replenishment.

If you are going merely on the inflationary run up of another stock and commodities bubble, may I suggest a comparison to another of the world's economies: Zimbabwe. At best, our economy will resemble the deflationary spiral of Japan's twenty year economic debacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongobobtherealone Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. YEPPERS!!!!!
I don't get that! Well, actually, i do but it's sickening to think about. A lot of shit is coming down across the pond about Blairs participation in the Iraq cluster fuck. I hope it gains traction over here.
Cheneys not the only one that should be locked up. What ever happened to "it's treason to question the POTUS during time of war" or whatever he and all the other RWers were saying during the Bush years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. I agree that Gethner and Summers should be fired
but Geithner was head of the NY Fed, which is suppose to regulate Wall Street but Geithner didn't think he was suppose to be a regulator.

Summners is definiteley a Rubin disciple and he championed deregulation of Wall Street during Clinton's Admin and that deregulation along with the Repukes efforts helped us get into the mess we are in now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. The "free market" is a fiction . . .
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 08:57 AM by Krashkopf
It is a product of Milton Freedman's wildest wet dreams. It does not - and cannot - exist in the real world. The only place where it can exist is in a small society where everyone, literally, knows everybody else.

Attempts to impose a so-called free market it on the world have led, DIRECTLY, to death and destuction around the globe, including the current economic meltdown.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Aren't you precious.
Bless your heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. "precious" is gone now.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. It was no mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. unfortunately true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. didn't he work for Bill Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes he did . . .
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 09:14 AM by Krashkopf
After campaigning as a progressive, Bill Clinton - the best Republican president of the last 30 years - became a "Chicago School" acolyte. As a result, we got NAFTA and CAFTA which have been ruinous for the American middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. "Mistake" seems an unusual choice of words ---
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 10:17 AM by defendandprotect
Obama certainly knew who these people were and what their backgrounds were --

and what roles they had played in past "mistakes" -- and direction they would likely

take new policies --- i.e., corporate !!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. Not mistake. DECISION. For us, anyway, cause it's working out GREAT for THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
25. Obama made a "mistake"? but it's "working very well for them" anyway, so no biggie
somehow, I would not have used the word "mistake" about this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC