Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

mtp..."fair and balanced" - - not!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 10:02 AM
Original message
mtp..."fair and balanced" - - not!
Edited on Mon Nov-22-10 10:02 AM by babylonsister
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_11/026750.php

WILD, WILD WEST.... Last week's episode of "Meet the Press" featured an interview with a Democrat, an interview with a Republican, and a four-person roundtable featuring three conservatives and a journalist. (The Republican guest, by the way, was John McCain, who appears on the show so often, he's had his mail forwarded to the green room.) ;)

This week's episode was similar: an interview with a Democrat, an interview with a Republican, and a four person roundtable featuring two conservatives, a journalist, and a vaguely center-left author.

But that's really only part of the problem. Only one lawmaker was included on the program, and given who received the invitation, it's hard to imagine what the bookers were thinking.

{Yesterday} morning on NBC's Meet the Press, Rep.-elect Allen West (R-FL) somewhat puzzlingly joined the show's panel, which also featured Paul Gigot of the Wall Street Journal, author and reporter Richard Wolffe, and the New York Times' Robert Draper. West is not yet a member of Congress, and is known mostly for his history of extreme statements targeting Islam, liberals, women -- all issues host David Gregory chose not to explore with West, instead asking him somewhat banal questions about things like TSA screenings and a possible Sarah Palin candidacy. <...>

If Meet the Press is going to ask extremists like Allen West to offer political analysis, it's their responsibility to let viewers understand West's philosophy clearly, so they can consider his views in the proper context
.


That seems more than reasonable.

West's inclusion on the panel is just bizarre. If the name seems familiar, West first gained notoriety during his military service in Iraq, when he was forced to retire from the Army for engaging in abusive interrogation techniques. More recently, he incorporated violent rhetoric into his campaign speeches, and made demonstrably ridiculous claims about his own background. Last month, we learned about West's ties to a violent gang of criminals, which the Justice Department believes is involved in drug running, arson, prostitution, robbery, and murder.

Soon after his election, West announced his choice to be his chief of staff: a right-wing radio talk-show host who hates immigrants, hates Muslims, and has raised the prospect of an armed insurrection against the United States government. (The host soon after said she would not join West's staff after all, but the fact that she was hired in the first place told us a great deal about the congressman-elect's judgment.)

Under saner circumstances, West would be considered a fringe crackpot. Under our circumstances, West is an invited guest on "Meet the Press" -- before he even casts a vote -- where he faced no scrutiny for his borderline-dangerous background.

I realize finding guests the Sunday before a major holiday might be difficult, but "Meet the Press" has to have higher standards than this, doesn't it?


—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. MTP is always sponsored by Boeing. They are biased by their war profiteering sponsors, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Since Obama became President (2 years) the Sunday AM Shows
have given the impression that the Republicans won
in 2008. Some shows have been all Republicans
or so close to it, my impression is it was all Republican.

Is this by design of the show or did Democrats decline
to come on the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. KKKarl Rove's back-up dancer has a RW Corporate reputation to uphold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC