Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Court Upholds Disclosure Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:51 AM
Original message
Federal Court Upholds Disclosure Law

Federal Court Upholds Disclosure Law

By Alex Knott
Roll Call Staff

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit told an anti-abortion group Tuesday that it has to disclose the names of its donors in accordance with Washington state laws.

While the case dealt with issues on the state level, the decision has national implications as the campaign finance community is haggling over transparency rules. The federal court ruled that all groups that try to influence ballot measures must register as political committees with the state and disclose their contributors and expenditures.

Attorney James Bopp Jr., who advised Citizens United in its Supreme Court case against the Federal Election Commission, represented the plaintiff, Human Life of Washington. Bopp argued that the nonprofit did not have to register and disclose its donors as a political action committee to run ads against the practice of assisted suicide.

“Today’s ruling was a victory for citizens over special interests,” said Paul Ryan, associate legal counsel for the Campaign Legal Center, which filed a brief in the case in favor of transparency. “As more and more anonymous special interest money is flooding into the 2010 election cycle, the Ninth Circuit ruling is particularly important in light of the fact that disclosure laws are facing challenges from coast-to-coast.”


As campaign money pours in, so do complaints




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bit of progress there . . . . !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Was the unrec personal or in disagreement with the court's decision?
Comment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC