Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Presidential Threat Task Force Formed because of increase in threats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 01:29 PM
Original message
Presidential Threat Task Force Formed because of increase in threats
Edited on Fri Aug-13-10 01:29 PM by RamboLiberal
Book: In the President's Secret Service - Additional Chapter in just released paperback edition. Task Force includes Secret Service, FBI, CIA.

For this paperback release, Kessler added a chapter about President Obama, whom he notes has seen a 400 percent increase in threats on his life since the tenure of President George W. Bush. An afterword reveals new details about Kessler’s discovery of a third uninvited intruder during last year’s White House State Dinner (see below). The behind-the-scenes anecdotes are delightful, but Kessler has a bigger point to make, one concerning why the under-appreciated Secret Service deserves better leadership.

1. Red lights are flashing. The increased number of threats to President Obama sparked the creation of a Presidential Threat Task Force, but not all its recommendations are being heeded: the Secret Service has at times failed to screen everyone with magnetometers at presidential appearances. Kessler says it’s senseless frugality driving the move, and it upps the odds of an assassination attempt (page 222).

2. High turnover is an ongoing problem. The ranks are stretched so thin that Secret Service agents sometimes work 18- to 20-hour days and routinely miss requalification training and physical training tests. Advancement is all about “juice” (connections), so Kessler says it’s no wonder there’s a high attrition rate, of 5 percent a year. In the Uniformed Division of the service, the rate is even higher: 12 percent. Kessler says more seasoned agents have watched most of their intial classes depart for other government agencies or the better-paid private sector (page 124).

3. About those White House party crashers. After Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan claimed that the Salahis were the only ones who were not on the guest list, Kessler received a call from a high-level Secret Service official who told him that the agency was covering up its missteps and there was a third intruder—Carlos Allen, a Washington party promoter. Kessler broke the story

http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/we-read-it/2010/08/04/in-the-president-s-secret-service-behind-the-scenes-with-agents-in-the-line-of-fire-and-the-presidents-they-protect.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't sound right.
Whoppi comming out and telling the lady to 'go back to the white house' sounds more like it was some manufactured event.

That is just a guess though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does Newsweak still exist?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt very many people here give a shit. Really.
Or is that just too cynical of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Lots of them are cheering at the threats, I suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. ...
So do I. Wonder when somebody's gonna start questioning his citizenship and religion. Might as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Some DUers already did that in not so subtle ways a few months ago.
They hopped right on the RW bandwagon, parroting Faux talking points all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Wouldn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC