Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The most conservative high court in decades

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:48 AM
Original message
The most conservative high court in decades
WASHINGTON — When Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and his colleagues on the Supreme Court left for their summer break at the end of June, they marked a milestone: The Roberts court had just completed its fifth term.

In those five years, the court not only moved to the right but also became the most conservative one in living memory, based on an analysis.

And for all the debate about the confirmation of Elena Kagan or the addition of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, there is no reason to think they will make a difference in the court’s ideological balance. Indeed, the data show that only one recent replacement altered its direction, that of Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in 2006, pulling the court to the right.

There is no similar switch on the horizon. That means Roberts, 55, is facing what is likely to be a long tenure at the head of a court entering a period of stability.

If the Roberts court continues on the course suggested by its first five years, it is likely to allow a greater role for religion in public life, to permit more participation by unions and corporations in elections, and to elaborate further on the scope of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms. Abortion rights are likely to be curtailed, as are affirmative action and protections for people accused of crimes.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/07/25/the_most_conservative_high_court_in_decades/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. "The SupremeOs are WAY cool. Smirk." - RepubliCorporate 'Citizens' (R)
Edited on Sun Jul-25-10 07:59 AM by SpiralHawk
"Ha ha. Too bad (smirk) about you little people. Smirk." - RepubliCorporate 'Citizens' (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Great picture!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. This one is missing from Thomas's robe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fugop Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is what killed me back in 2000...
I sure wish more folks had recognized this would happen back in 2000. When people would tell me they didn't like Gore or Bush so they didn't care, when they said they were the same, when they said, "If he's awful, he'll just get voted out in four years," I tried to tell people that if nothing else, they should think about the Supreme Court, because that's a lifetime.

I never understand why candidates - Democratic candidates - didn't sound the alarm a little more vigorously about the court. Now we're stuck with these people. It's so depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Me Too
Apparently, many Liberals haven't learned this lesson - as evidenced by some of the Obama bashing. Now, criticizing President Obama is fine, he has been disappointing on several issues. However, when people talk about running another Democrat in the 2012 Presidential primary - a sure fire way to lose the White House - I have to wonder if we aren't cutting off our thumb to spite our hand.

OF course, it is a sad state of affairs when it seems the reason to elect Obama is "(if McCain had been elected) it could have been worse."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. The court (and courts) will always be viruntly con because Democrats placate the GOP by putting
moderates (at best) up for the bench. Not an effective way to counter the far-reich whack jobs whom the pukes stack at every level.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It doesn't matter if you have the most liberals of liberals on the court. Does anyone
think that any Justice would change the minds of Alito, Roberts, Thomas, Scalia and Kennedy? Kennedy is perhaps the only one and really, he has said he never wanted to be a swing vote. He is still a conservative. The changes will happen when one of those five retire or die. And it looks like it will be Ginsburg next for retirement.
Also, Sotomayor has voted with Ginsburg more then any other justice. I never understood this criticism, she seems plenty liberal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yep ... The right right now ...
is to try to keep in the 5-4 minority ...

Next up to be replaced is Ginseberg ...

NO WAY any of the Rs step down voluntarily under BOs watch - meaning most likley the next 6 years ... The election after that one will be huge here ... If a strong D can get in after BO, it makes it a LONG stretch for the Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy without a window to get out, and odds are better a health issue might knock one out ...

The SC is the holy grail for the right - they have ALWAYS viewed it as the backdoor to push their deranged crape outside of popular elections ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. +1. Sotomayor has voted with Ginburt more than any other justice. Thanks
for pointing that out. Facts matter to most of us here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. So, Obama is now supposed to be able to magically override a 5-4 conservative majority????
We're getting into Harry Potter territory here. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC