Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Perfect example of why Obama WH went after Faux last year was just on CNN. Story on NBPP.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 10:02 PM
Original message
Perfect example of why Obama WH went after Faux last year was just on CNN. Story on NBPP.
Edited on Fri Jul-23-10 10:08 PM by Pirate Smile
CNN has totally bought the Fox crap and mainlined it into the other channels.

Of course, the WHPC and all the villagers (even those on the Left) got up in arms about the WH going after Faux and defended Faux.

Disgusting.

edit to add - if you had only seen that story and didn't know anything else then you would think there is a good chance the Obama Justice Dept is refusing to prosecute African Americans and only going after White people. Way to go, CNN. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was back in October......
and yep....in fact, come to think of it, he's been getting hella bad press
ever since then! Even the NYT got their jab in....of how the White House
was going after poor little Fox News! All anyone has to do is google
Obama....Fox News...October 2009.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep, from last October:
'“We simply decided to stop abiding by the fiction, which is aided and abetted by the mainstream press, that Fox is a traditional news organization,” said Dan Pfeiffer, the deputy White House communications director. Later that week, White House officials said, they noticed a column by Clark Hoyt, the public editor of The Times, in which Jill Abramson, one of the paper’s two managing editors, described her newsroom’s “insufficient tuned-in-ness to the issues that are dominating Fox News and talk radio.” The Washington Post’s executive editor, Marcus Brauchli, had already expressed similar concerns about his newsroom.

White House officials said comments like those had focused them on a need to make their case that Fox had an ideological bent undercutting its legitimacy as a news organization.'


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us/politics/23fox.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The saying goes....Don't go against someone who buys ink by the barrel.....
Old but still true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC