|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 06:26 PM Original message |
Section 2 of DOMA has been found unconstitutional - how will Obama's DOJ react? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. "The Obama administration now has the perfect opportunity to do.... nothing. They have no obligation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
2. How many federal districts do you want to limit this ruling to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 07:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. A DOMA case is not the best vehicle for a USSC ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That's a more distant target, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 08:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. the difference being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 09:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. ...with the exception of New York |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-09-10 07:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
28. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm not holding my breath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. I hope they don't appeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. So you don't want same sex couples in Iowa to be federally recognized? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I'd like them all to be recognized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 08:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. This ruling is effective in Massachusetts, period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I see, much thanks for breaking it down for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 08:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. No prob. - watch the outrage when it is appealed.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Per his own DOJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Please don't put words in my mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. We've had a whole discussion about which case should go to the USSC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Ummm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 11:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Prop 8 is going to be appealed regardless of which side wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 11:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. If the Mass v US ruling is appealed, there will be outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 11:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Since no one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-09-10 08:02 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. No, the poster is abandoning it because you're intractible. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 11:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I don't see where he called you a bigot. you should stop putting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 11:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Another vote against LGBT rights in Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. Actually, I still want it taken to SCOTUS... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. The specific issue here is a real challenge for conservative jurists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hitman (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. 10th Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. It can't be full faith and credit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hitman (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-08-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. EPC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC