Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Matthews: Palin could win the GOP nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:58 AM
Original message
Chris Matthews: Palin could win the GOP nomination
Not only does Chris Matthews think Sarah Palin could run for president, but he thinks she could win the Republican nomination.

“An early knockout is the way she can win,” he said on “Morning Joe.” “The media will try to destroy her, of course, but if she goes early, wins early, I think she can win it before anyone can stop her.”

He envisioned her winning the Iowa Republican caucus, losing in New Hampshire, but winning in South Carolina, where her endorsement just helped push Nikki Haley to victory. Then it would be up to Michigan, where Palin has been pounding the pavement on her book tour.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/0710/Matthews_Palin_can_win_GOP_nom.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fugop Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. He kills me
Love how he says the media will try to destroy her. For the love of all that's holy, it's the media that freakin' CREATED the myth of gawddamn Sarah. The media props her up constantly! She's the one who destroyed her own credibility by being unable to answer what magazines she reads.

Matthews is ridiculous.

That being said, I hope to high heaven that he's right. I would LOVE to see Sarah Palin as the nominee. The number of disgusted Republicans would skyrocket!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. On Morning Joe he sounds like a conservative "yes the media will attack her"
but then on his own show he'll go after her and if he appears with Rachel or Keith he'll sound like a liberal. Tweety is a chameleon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde-that's him. HE destroys her the majority of the time
by saying things like she's the least curious politician he knows, she prides herself in her ignorance, and on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
60. And none of that means she can''t get the nomination.
No one thought either of the Bushes could ever be a serious contender either!! We live in a very peculiar age. Anything can happen. Vigilance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. Think about it. He was Carter's speech writer and admitted to voting for Reagan in the '80 election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. And then the others on the panel said if that's the case, it's pretty much a slam-dunk for Obama in
2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Be careful what you wish for...Yes she is stupid, yes she appeals to the basest of voters..
..and Yes she could win...or did everyone forget the last idiot no-one thought could win and what he did to this great country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not many people, certainly not ENOUGH people, want to repeat the mistake of voting for
the idiot we've had for the last 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. There were enough people to put him in office for a second term.
The thought of President Palin just chills me to the bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. His approval rating wasn't nearly as low as it was by the time he left office.
People seem to have learned that a stupid president is NOT what we want. The majority does not want Palin to run for president, not even all of her FANS want her to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. You'd be surpriused. My godmother, who hated Bush, LOVES Sarah Palin. It scares me that .........
we are related, but facts are facts. People love her because they see her as the underdog and feel that the media just beats up on her because she is a woman with an opinion.

To be fair, she is a woman, and does have an opinion - the problem is that it's not a well informed opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. That doesn't mean she wants Palin to be president...
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 07:03 PM by jenmito
her fans that go to her book signings and speeches love her but don't necessarily want her to run for president BECAUSE they don't want her to be "beat up" in the media and like her better as a tv host or other kind of entertainer. I've seen people being interviewed at her events saying so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. She wants her to be President. She sat at my kitchen table and went on and on about ........
how much she hopes Sarah would run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. OK, well polls show many people (Repubs.) don't feel the same way, including her supporters. n/t
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 07:31 PM by jenmito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I don't put much faith in polls. Even scientific polls aren't always the reliable .....
a lot depends on the wording and who is conducting the poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Well, here's one anyway, after her book tour:
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 08:40 PM by jenmito
"A large majority of Americans, seven in ten, say they do not want Sarah Palin to run for President. 56% of Republicans also do not want the former VP nominee to seek the office.
WOULD YOU WANT TO SEE SARAH PALIN RUN FOR PRESIDENT?
All Reps Dems Inds
Yes 21% 30% 8% 25%
No 71 56 88 65
While favorable toward her, conservatives, specifically, also do not want to see Palin run in 2012: 58% of conservatives say she should not."

http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/poll_palin_011810.pdf?tag=contentMain;contentBody
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. There's a very frightening statistic in that poll ......
DOES TEA PARTY REFLECT VIEWS OF MOST AMERICANS?
(Among those who’ve heard of Tea Party)
Yes 46%
No 40%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. That was in Jan. Now a majority of Americans say no. It was taken after people started
seeing MORE of teabaggers-like Rand Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. So now the whole poll is outdated. Gotcha. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Yup. Now those who want Palin to run for president are even lower and those who
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 10:02 PM by jenmito
DON'T share the views of the teabaggers are higher-as shown here:

From June '10:

A new Washington Post/ABC News poll includes questions about the tea parties that have the nascent movement's popularity slipping badly. Overall, since the last poll, the percentage of Americans who hold an unfavorable view of the movement has jumped from 39 percent to 50 percent. The leading edge of that has been a collapse in support from 18-29-year-olds. In March, they had a positive, 43-38 view of the tea parties. They've swung hard to a negative view, 27-60.

One result that surprises me: a seeming tumble in tea party support from white Southerners. In March, only 30 percent had an unfavorable view of the movement. Now, it's 45 percent.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/06/poll_the_sagging_popularity_of.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I seem to remember something
LOL! But you are right. I wished she would be the nominee till I thought back to Bush II. I thought he never had a chance against Gore. And if they steal another election we would be sunk. Canada here I come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Bush "won" in 2000 Because of his familiy's connections
in the state government of FLA and the SCOTUS.

He "won" again in 2004 because of 9/11.

IOW, he never won a clean, fair election on his own, which is something that Palin would have to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. And Reagan?
Another idiot who Democrats thought would lead to a guaranteed second term for Jimmy Carter. How do you explain him away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Reagan Was Not An Idiot
He was a fierce ideologue who grew senile as he got older, but he was no idiot like Bush and Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Reagan's IDEAS were idiotic, but he was a trained actor.
He knew how to deliver a speech and thus wrap his ideas in a pretty package.

Palin's ideas are also idiotic, but her speeches are unbearable. She will not find the same success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Do not mis-underestimate Palin
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 04:54 PM by golfguru
She draws big crowds for every speech. She is constantly on TeeVee.
She writes books which make her ten's of millions. She lives by
being controversial because it gains her free publicity. Her name
recognition is probably better than most other GOP candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Three words
Iranian Hostage Crisis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. Reagan was a great POLITICIAN
Great at playing the part. A horrible person and one of our worst leaders ever, but he know how to play the game.

Palin is a fool on all levels. And she isn't even getting smarter with the exposure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. S H E I S N O T R E A G E N ....
or even Bush II for that matter ...

Reagen had spent LITERALLY decades cutting his teeth as a politician, and as a leading voice in the party ... He was a SERIOUS candidate in 80, SERIOUS ...

Bush and Reagen were not geniuses, but they had more discipline in their pinkies than Palin has in her whole body. Both were VERY well rehearsed and had their pat answers down pat ... While very strident to the "conservative" ideology, they both campaigned as men of reason and who would work with the other side ... Reagen pitched a new day in america, Bush pitched a kindler, gentler conservatism and return to dignity in the oval office after the horror that was the Clinton administration ...

Palin has zero ability to stay message, and can't go three paragraphs without throwing red meat. She does not have a conciliatory bone in her body, and has so many stinking blind spots that she has no ability to shadow her simple mindedness without having a completely unchallanged forum ...

She also has burnt A LOT of bridges in the party ... And, any sensible campaigner, the people behind the scenes who WIN the elections won't go near her. Reagen and Bush knew they were actors for the role, and let the real horses run the show ... They were both tireless campaigners and followed the long range strategies of their advisors. Palin is all about PALIN, she is erratic and won't head advice ...

She is 1000 times more likely to blow out early than win early ...

Frankly, she is a little stronger Rudy Guiliani type, and Mathews loved him some Rudy ... But, Rudy was lazy and did not want to do the work, and his campaign was dead before it started when he decided to wait for Florida to get in the game ... That is the kind of cockimany crape Palin is likely to pull ...

Reagen was the insiders insider, Bush was the son of Poppy, they had VERY loyal supporters, a lot of them,a built in network and broad support ... Palin, again, is just some twit running around throwing bombs, and the party will not buy into her ...

The other candidates will trip overthemselves dotting to her, and try to outshout the others in making her the victim for blowing up in order to try to engender themselves with his lunatic base ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
62. But he was able to get close enough to steal it.
And that was enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
61. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 05:21 PM
Original message
No slam dunk!!
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 05:22 PM by SkyDaddy7
If the attitude on DU toward Obama is a forecast to how Democrats will vote or should I say won't vote then Obama might lose to even Sarah Palin.

I saw a DU poll today that said half of the DU Democrats would not vote for Obama in 2012...Obama has not done everything they want in 2yrs so screw him let another batshit crazy Republican drive us further down the road to a Corporate controlled Theocracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh Chris STFU
I just love this "The media will try to destroy her" ???????? She does a good job on her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Our Media Is So Shallow
In no other industrialized democratic nation on this planet would someone like Palin ever be taken seriously for high office. They would dismiss her out of hand.

She has neither the intelligence, experience, or ability to be president of the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Chris must have no RNC operatives or contacts
The RNC will do everything they can to destroy her politically if she dares to run... according to my RNC contact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
37. The RNC is just like the DNC. Some inside the RNC will do what ever they can to ..............
kill her chances at the nomination. But there are some within the RNC that will bash their own to get her to the top. It will basically pit the tea partiers and christian coalition against the military hawks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. My bet is on Romney Palin is in the news all of the time just like Hillary was
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 01:34 PM by bigdarryl
and Tweety and every other pundit though she had the nomination wrapped up. Palin ain't winning shit because a lot of rethugs know she's an idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. I bet someone like John Thune will win-someone who's not really being talked about yet...
just like Obama in '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Hardly. This IS the GOP we're talking about. n/t
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 01:47 PM by ingac70
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I don't mean someone lke Obama will run...
I am saying someone who's not well-known yet (just like Obama wasn't well-known yet) will be their nominee. Palin won't even run IMO because she'd have to answer questions from real reporters, and Romney is too hated by the teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. I knew what you meant....
and that just isn't the MO of Repubs. They have never had a candidate like that. It will be the same old tired line up of weirdos, or Jeb Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric Condon Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
58. That's just it though - she WOULDN'T have to answer questions from "real" reporters
The media would softball her the whole time because she's good for ratings. Can you IMAGINE how much the media wants a Palin presidency? Their political coverage finally be indistinguishable from their Lohan coverage, which is TPTB's ultimate goal: a populace so stupid it accepts politics as reality TV, but with some seriously vile people hiding in plain sight making policies whose effects really would be real.

We ignore Palin and the Teabaggers at our own peril. Even people who don't identify as Teabaggers, or who aren't necessarily Palin fans, still have the EXACT same mentality as these hateful, ignorant, selfish fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. Chris Matthews could shine my shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NICO9000 Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. 3rd party who will peel votes of the R candidate
It takes hundreds of millions to win. I still believe she simply will not have the huge $$$ behind her and she can't make it on small donations from her base. Plus, she's far too polarizing and will not be able to appeal the average voter (no matter how stupid they may or may not be).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. There is also a good possibility that there will be a 3rd party candidate to peel votes from the D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. We wish. But our wishes aside, Tweety is an imbicile if he
truly believes that. The GOP would destroy her before they'd allow her to be their nominee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's certainly within the realm of possibility, but she'd never ever win a general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. Chris Matthews thought they could send divers to the
gusher 5,000 feet below the surface of the ocean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. Only in my wildest dreams.... Palin with GOP nomination = Obama landslide win in '12
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kjackson227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. Jekyll and Hyde is right when describing Matthews...
He has way too much adulation for her which is why I don't watch his program as much anymore. I also think Keith needs to stop referencing Limpballs so much, also. Personally, I don't give a rat's *ss what these people say, think, or do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
33. Oh, I think her fellow GOP hopefuls would destroy her long before the media ever got a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. +1 - She hasn't got a chance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. Wouldn't get past Iowa.
DOA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
42. I've long believed that if the economy improves, she'll be the nominee.
If things get better early enough before 2012, I can see most of the "viable" GOP candidates dropping out and eyeing 2016. I could easily see the GOP hierarchy allow her to be the sacrificial lamb in 2012 as it would accomplish two things. First, it would be a nice bone to throw to the tea baggers. Second, when Obama trounces her in the general, the GOP power brokers would then have a good case to tell them to STFU in 2016. Although they are polar opposites on the political spectrum, she would be playing the role of Bob Dole in 1996.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
47. I would say, "we can only hope". But I really wouldn't want to tempt fate.
Crazy accidents of history do happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
49. Pathetic attention seekers- the both of them
Why anyone takes either Matthews or Paling seriously is beyond me. Pox on both their houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
50. It could very well happen
The GOP has a lot of insurgents that vote in primaries and there is nothing they can do to hold them back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
52. I have been saying the same thing for more than a year. Tweety is spot on!
Right to Lifers in Iowa Followed by a win in South Carolina and she freezes all fundraising making it nearly impossible for other to keep going. If the only other candidate left standing after SC is Mittens. she has a prohibitive lock on the nomination. The only way she loses the nod at that point is a gaffed of Michael Steele proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. The stupid people in this country,want one of their own to lead them!
And the republicans are really stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #53
69. During the 1778 days....Tweety woulda rode with them Loyalists and not us Patriots...as did the
Conservatives....

Tweety woulda been at the Bastille or Versaille...defending King Louie/Antoinette

Evolution tells us of his now GRAND GLORY.....will soon be only a STORY...

How will his story be read? For the Masses or for the Masters???

How will he ride with???

Who guides the GOP???

Ya noes it ain't the Masses....misery level is way up

So...by elimination....its gatta be the TERs....those that lead/guide/rule/exploite over the rest of us...
Mass TERs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
56. Matthews is an idiot sometimes and this is a classic case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
57. Have to ask Tweety why he thinks the Iowa caucus
would break for Palin.

I"m not seein' it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
59. Slow fucking news month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
63. Tweety is full of shit. He licks his finger and puts it in the air. Why do people waste time
listening to his bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
64. If I were a Republican operative/consultant I'd want to be working for another candidate against her
In my sleep I could come up with dozens of anti-Palin talking points. So, I'm sure could anyone else. Come to think of it, I would want to be against Palin and Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. Most operatives of either party are in it for the money not the win
They get a cut of the ad dollars as part of their compensation.... If Palin gets in. she is going to have a truckload of money to spend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #66
68. I'm speaking neither of the desire to win or the money, just the 'easy' factor
I like a good fight and to make money like anyone else, but every once in a while, I like easy too. A consultant working for a Republican Presidential hopeful against Palin and Romney has a veritable treasure trove of things to work with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
65. Well, Levi is on his apology tour...so I see that as an indication that she plans to run
Back when Levi was "spilling" on all things Palin I said that by the time primary season rolled around there'd be a big reconciliation between Levi and the Palin's.

It wouldn't do to have the standard bearer for the "family values" party to have an unwed mother for a daughter standing on stage. So, I fully expect Levi and Bristol to be standing side by side if not engaged by the time Palin throws her hat in the ring.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
67. Auto-Unrec for Palin thread that is not about Michael Palin
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC