Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you support Al Franken as a Presidential candidate in 2016?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:51 PM
Original message
Poll question: Would you support Al Franken as a Presidential candidate in 2016?
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 05:53 PM by ZombieHorde
eta: my final poll option ran too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. What if Sanders or Feingold run in 2012 for the nomination?

They've been around a lot longer than Al Franken and would have more credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Al Franken may have a lot more credibility 6 years from now than he has today.
He has been successful so far and may gain a strong following.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Meh, I don't think he could deliver speeches as well most other candidates.
I know I wouldn't want to sit twough four years of those speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I would not want to follow Pres. Obama in the speech giving category. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd strongly consider it.
But I'm open to others. My dream candidate would probably be Barbara Lee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I like Al, but he would never win in a two horse race for POTUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. By "two horse," do you mean Dem vs Dem or Dem vs Rep? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Dem vs Rep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Ok, I did not know if you were refing to the primaries or the election.
Why don't you think he could beat a Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Because, it would be similar to the '72 election...
Until I know more of Al's position on issues thats what I think would happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Only if he promised to give a funny inaugural address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. There won't be another senator elected in 2016
Or probably in the forseeable future after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why not? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It's only happened three times in history
Warren Harding in 1920

JFK in 1960

Barack Obama in 2008.

And the 2008 contest was semi-rigged, because the media picked who they wanted in the race, and it came down to a Repuke senator vs an extended primary between two Democratic senators, so it was going to be a senator no matter what by the time the campaign "officially" started in January 2008.

Most presidents have been either sitting VP's or governors. JFK narrowly beat Nixon, the sitting VP, and Harding beat Governor James Cox. Ironically enough, the veep nominee on the Cox ticket was a guy named Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Also odd that both candidates in that race were from Ohio. And Ken Blackwell wasn't even born yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Why do you think senators have such a difficult time becoming President? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Governors and VP's have executive experience
voters usually see that as a better qualification for the "biggest executive job in the country" than the legislative experience of a Senator. Unless the governor on the ticket is a complete imbecile like Sarah Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Plus Senators have actual voting records
that the opposition can bring up against them. If you're a governor you just have to watch who you grant a pardon or clemency to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nope
He would get his ass handed to him in 2016 in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. no chance in hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. OK, but how about on Earth?
I guess I should have stated which dimension and planet I was referring to in my OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. The history of drug use would probably sink him.
Admitted and documented and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. I would. I really would.
Nothing else to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'd like to see what he does over the next 8 years
But sure, I'd definitely take a look at him if he ran in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. I've got a lot of faith in Al. He's not just a "former comedian"...
like he's portrayed. Listening to his AAR show I was impressed with his knowledge of the law. I think we'll see some great things from Al during his term.

Plus the fact he's always going to be a thorn in the RW's hide gives me great pleasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
24. Only to watch Bill O'Reilly say "President Franken"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastNaturalist Donating Member (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
25. 2016?
Little early, no? Mark Warner, Jim Webb, Brian Schweitzer, Amy Klobuchar - my preferences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I like Schweitzer as well. His first hand knowledge of the ME and his fluent Arabic
could be very useful for today's world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. He has no track record yet
and he was one of the people who signed a letter asking that coal plans get all their current carbon output waived. Now, this is just one issue, but an important one.

Only time will tell if by 2016 he would have the gravitas to be considered seriously. This is true for ANY possible candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. He would carry MN. Something Pawlenty has no chance of doing.
Pawlenty is getting ready to do massive layoffs (spending cuts = layoffs at this point) in MN so that he can keep his perfect record of "no new taxes" so he can run for president. He's going to drive the state into the ground so he can have his 15 minutes of fame and the Dems are making a very loud statement pointing that out. If you think Bush was a dictator, try Pawlenty. It cracks me up with I hear Rachel Maddow refer to him as a moderate. He is about as moderate as Sarah Palin. But instead of a bridge to nowhere, he has no bridge.

No new taxes = increased property taxes, sales taxes and fees on everything. But his rich buddies don't have to pay more in income tax so "no new taxes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. Listen to (or read) his book "Why Not Me?" for a preview of his campaign
It's the book he wrote about his fictional run for the 2000 Presidential Election. I'm sure the book is good, but the audiobook is produced and performed like a radio play and is just hilarious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
32. No, I don't think I'll be supporting him for '16
Not to take anything away from Sen. Franken, but I recommend tabling this discussion at least until he can demonstrate an ability to win reelection by a margin in excess of three figures...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC