It seems like us wanting our principles to turn into policies is a problem
CreekDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:07 PM
Original message
It seems like us wanting our principles to turn into policies is a problem
for some "unnamed" sources in the White House. but I don't see how keeping quiet about it is going to make those things happen any quicker. and I don't see how anybody with a brain thinks in 2010 that anybody can or should be quiet about what they want.
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks to me as if there is some question as to what "our principles" actually are...
Not sure progressives and DLC/New Dems share the same principles.
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hate unnamed, off the record, anonymous official stories.
Loose lips sink ships. Man, all of my posts are really negative today.
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think the difference between "dems" and "old dems" is largely tactical
New Dems think change only occurs when we get to govern and thus change is inherently incremental. Old Dems think that the Principle overshadow all other consideration and if we can't have our cake now. there is little point. Old Dems would rather protest then govern....New Dems would rather govern than be oppositional.
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. New Dems simply enable Republicans. nt
CreekDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Old dems got a lot of sh*t done
Not quite comfortable with the apparent dismissal of them.
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Probably the only thing I hate more than anonymous sources...
is labeling and putting people in a box based on their ideas. I think that this only helps discredit people as a group, rather than talking about the merits of an idea.
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its pretty obvious even to me as a retard who the source was
CreekDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't know why people think he's a "fixer"
more like a bull in a china shop (yeah, I know that myth's been busted but...)
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Your principles are tough in a democracy where others disagree with you
Edited on Wed Jun-09-10 04:40 PM by stray cat
even Arkansans voted for their own representative instead of listening to any one member of DU.
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. What? People disagree with me?
They must either be ignorant, stubborn or mentally deficient. :sarcasm:
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Jun-09-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey look, Politico sliming the White House with "unnamed sources".
I don't believe for a second that anyone with any brains in the top echelons of power in the White House would be stupid enough to say this, even if they did believe it. Politico is reaching.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.