Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Romanoff Details White House Job Talks From W.H. Deputy C.O.S. - Developing. ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
gokira Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:33 PM
Original message
Romanoff Details White House Job Talks From W.H. Deputy C.O.S. - Developing. ...
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 07:42 PM by gokira
Specific positions dangled by White House deputy chief of staff to clear field for Bennet.




Colorado Senate candidate releases tick tock of talks with administration. http://thepage.time.com/statement-romanoff-on-job-offer-rumors-june-2-2010/

Says he was told he could have USAID Deputy Assistant Administrator for Latin America and Caribbean, USAID Office of Democracy and Governance Director or U.S. Trade and Development Agency Director.

Read "help wanted/offered" job descriptions here. http://markhalperin.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/messina-romanoff_email.pdf







http://thepage.time.com/2010/06/02/romanoff-details-white-house-job-talks/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/02/andrew-romanoff-white-house-job-offer_n_598293.html


dems sure eat eachother
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. All this does is give issa something to get on
tv about..it's a non controversary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokira Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. OP
Huge Update
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. The repukes are just shocked about this kind of behavior...just shocked...
http://drudgeretort.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/ronald-reagan-st-ronnie-offered-to-candidate-if-he-would-drop-out-of-race/

Ronald Reagan (St. Ronnie) Offered Job To Candidate If He Would Drop Out of Race!!!

with 29 comments

Reagan adviser reportedly offered CA senator a job with the administration “if he decided not to seek re-election.” A November 25, 1981, Associated Press article (from the Nexis database) reported that President Reagan’s political adviser Ed Rollins planned to offer former California Sen. S.I. Hayakawa a job in the administration in exchange for not seeking re-election.

Read more…

It’s time we had a full investigation into the Reagan administration and their acts of corruption. How long will we be kept in the dark? Our children have been indoctrinated into believing that Reagan (St. Ronnie) was a good president, yet he was on the same level as George W. Bush as far as corruption and incompetence. It’s just that our mainstream media has covered up these stories about Republicans yet every day they “report” fabricated stories about Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokira Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 07:58 PM by gokira
but this is maybe bigger since it is the White House
Deputy Chief Of Staff

Obama should have had a low level Advisor, but Clinton involved with the PA deal and Mesina involved with this deal, I hope Obama is preparing for the fire from this


this is is bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. your concern noted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The only thing shocking is how fucking stupid Democrats are
for actually telling the media this happened.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokira Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Wait
Aren't these Liberals doing this to a Bipartisan President, I don't get it

I thought DLC Dems Only did this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. You gone yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Are they bitter or just like to feed the gNOp
impeachment machine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Just Fools. Democrats will never be mistaken as smart
political strategists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokira Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. True
But why would you put Bill Clinton Or the freakin Duputy Chief Of Staff's Name on it, that's really stupid


Is one of Axelrod's flunkies busy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It does kind of blow the mind considering
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 08:30 PM by Cha
how the gNOp & corporatemediawhores have..a different set of rules for President Obama.

'WITHOUT PRECEDENT -- EXCEPT FOR ALL THE OTHER TIMES"

"..Which, as it turns out, one of the defining trends of the political discourse over the last 16 months. Several months ago, Atrios noted, "When Dems are president, perfectly normally ways of doing things are rebranded as somehow odd."

Ain't that the truth.

* Teleprompters: This trend of characterizing routine developments as controversial started very early in the Obama presidency. Every modern president has used teleprompters, but Republicans and the media thought it was hilarious and wildly important when Obama did the same thing.

* Bowing: Several presidents have been photographed bowing to foreign heads of state, but Republicans and the media thought it was absolutely scandalous when Obama did the same thing when meeting leaders where bowing is customary.

* Talking to school kids: Presidents Reagan and H.W. Bush spoke to school children in national addresses, even taking a little time to push their political agendas. When Obama delivered a speech encouraging kids to do well in school, Republicans freaked out; Fox News compared the president to Saddam Hussein; and the New York Times literally ran a front-page story about it.

* Czars: For a half-century, presidents have relied on so-called "czars" for various policy areas. By one count, George W. Bush had 36 czar positions filled by 46 people during his two terms. No one cared. Obama's use of czars became the subject of months of media scrutiny, and even congressional hearings in response to Republican apoplexy.

* Oval Office attire: Several modern presidents have been seen in the Oval Office without wearing a suit jacket. When Obama did it, Republicans ran to the press to complain, and the media actually published pieces on the subject.

* Criticizing partisan media: White House complaints about unfair media coverage are as old as the republic. When the Obama White House noted what is plainly true about Fox News -- it's a Republican outlet -- the media went a little berserk, with the Washington Post and NPR characterizing the administration's criticism as "Nixonian."

* Reconciliation: Republican policymakers have relied on reconciliation to get around filibusters for decades. When Obama recommended the same tactic for health care, the GOP pretended it was an outrageous assault on the political process, and the media pretended Republicans' cries were legitimate.

* Industry bailouts: Government bailouts of struggling American industries and major companies have been common for decades. When Obama rescued GM, it was used as an example of his purported desire to a communist dictator.

* Campaign intervention: Every president has had a hand in campaign activities, with several presidents offering jobs to candidates to get them out of various races. When the Obama White House intervened in Pennsylvania's Democratic Senate primary -- offering a House member an unpaid advisory gig -- the media found it fascinating and Republicans called for the FBI and a special prosecutor to intervene.

* Memorial Day: Many presidents have not appeared at Arlington on Memorial Day. When Obama does it, there's a "controversy."

I'm all in favor of holding presidents to high standards. They have enormous power and leadership responsibilities, and it stands to reason that much will be expected of them. I enthusiastically endorse demanding the most of our leaders.

But for a year and a half, the political world seems to have created whole new rules for Obama, which aren't applied to others -- and haven't even been applied to other presidents.

This week's flaps over Sestak and Memorial Day plans only reinforce how truly ridiculous the phenomenon has become."


—Steve Benen 11:00 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (33)

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_05/024030.php#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. This is the very reason there are so few Dem Presidents
I see the little representation the Dems have in the MSM that includes radio, the hosts go out of their way to act as if they are not supporting the President in lock step like the right would support theirs. In my opinion they seem to take pride in ripping the President as if they will earn brownie points, the other side sits back and laughs then uses their words to attack the Dem President as well. I have read and heard that this thing happened to Clinton as well, sad.

To be fair this could be that Republican Presidents do very little while in office war and tax cuts not much to bitch about if you are a supporter, Dem Presidents tackle issues that affect all citizens directly, so that maybe why being more supportive is that much harder on the Dem side. Also the Dem party seems to have more college graduates which makes for many more critical thinkers or many who feel they know best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokira Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Look
The Corporate Media Starts to Give their OP Eds



HALPERIN'S TAKE: This case seems potentially more serious than the Sestak matter for at least three reasons: the dangler was a government official and not a private citizen/intermediary; the jobs dangled were paid positions (unlike the unpaid advisory slot dangled to Sestak); and Romanoff is not obviously as qualified for these jobs as Sestak was for the position discussed with him.


http://thepage.time.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Show me Halperin's concern when Republicans
did the same then I may pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokira Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Rom. Sure did
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 08:50 PM by gokira
Leak Alot To Halperin, he gave out a freakin PDF of an email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Not what I asked for, but carry on n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Who Did What Now?
Can I get a link up in here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Presidentin' while black
That's why there's a whole new set of standards for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. No one is accusing Obama of doing anything wrong
Only his staffers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. We need to fight back. This is not illegal
It's all a bullshit attempt to drag down the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Where are all of the people that were defending this Romanoff asshole? Democrats are so fukking
useless. You don't see this sh1t in the other party. THen we wonder why we can't win or get real change. This guy and Sestak are opportunistic assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I support these two progressives on policy and because they stand up to
the political establishment and the corporate powers that are destroying this country. Call them what you want but they and the other progressive challengers, like Bill Halter, will be the candidates celebrating victory on November 2nd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC