Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP's spill (and why they tried hard to lowball the amount of oil flowing into the Gulf)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 01:13 PM
Original message
BP's spill (and why they tried hard to lowball the amount of oil flowing into the Gulf)

BP's spill

By Kate Sheppard

Oil is still spewing into the Gulf of Mexico after last weekend’s latest failed attempt to stop the well. Now at day 43, the gulf gusher has unleashed at least 21.7 million gallons of oil, although the number could be as high as 45 million, based on the largest estimate from the government’s spill team.

The government team gave a likely range of 12,000 to 19,000 barrels a day leaking from the well; one team put the high end at 25,000 barrels. Even the low end is far higher than BP’s first estimated rate of spill, which was 1,000 barrels a day, and much higher than the government’s initial estimate of 5,000 barrels a day. These figures are of course important for the fate of the Gulf of Mexico, as we hear dire warnings of the long-term effects of all this oil. But it’s also key to figuring out exactly how much BP might owe the United States.

The company will be expected to pay for the response efforts, including all the money spent sending the Coast Guard and federal employees to the scene. It will also be expected to compensate the coastal communities and businesses destroyed by the spill. This is the area where there’s been much debate over raising the liability cap, currently set at the very, very low figure of $75 million. But the company will also be forced to pay up under the Clean Water Act, which allows the government to levy civil penalties in court for every barrel of oil spilled. (There could also be criminal penalties, depending on what the Justice Department determines.)

The base fine for a spill is $1,100 a barrel, but it can go as high as $4,300 a barrel if a federal court determines that the spill was the result of gross negligence by the responsible party. From what has come to light in the past few days, it’s looking more likely that BP ignored a number of warning signs about problems with the rig and well, so that might well be the case.

How do these numbers stack up? Well, if BP is found to be negligent and we believed their initial 1,000-barrel-a day figure, they’d only owe $184.9 million. If the low end of the government estimate is right, they’d owe $2.2 billion. And if the highest end is right? They’d owe $4.6 billion.

The difference is significant, so it’s little wonder that the company tried so hard for so long to minimize the damage. And now it looks like the spill could continue for months, meaning those dollars could start to add up.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. BP KNOWS how to do better. Like in Scotland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, BP sucks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. But the DIFFERENCE between how they conduct bidness in Scotland
and the U.S. is QUITE TELLING, doncha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the info. Did not know there was a set fine for per barrel spill with gross negligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This was obviously incentive for BP to
lie about the magnitude of the spill. Without the smoke screen, it's incentive for them to end it.

I hope they get served on every level, civil and criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. KR! Valuble info..thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC