Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Buck Stops on Obama’s Desk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:01 PM
Original message
The Buck Stops on Obama’s Desk
Published on Saturday, May 22, 2010 by CommonDreams.org

The Buck Stops on Obama’s Desk

by Lewis Seiler & Dan Hamburg

Meanwhile, inexplicably, BP remains in charge of the situation. They decide who are the "legitimate interested parties" to information. (Obviously, this does not include the general public!) For example, air monitoring along the shore and over the sea is being done by an organization called The Center for Toxicology and Environmental Health, hired and paid by BP. BP has also determined what kinds of chemical dispersants to use. They chose the eerily labeled Corexit, and sprayed at least 600,000 gallons of it on the sea. If by "corrects it" we mean hides it, as in "out of sight, out of mind", they chose wisely. However, it turns out that Corexit is also, according to the EPA, "carcinogenic, mutagenic, and highly toxic." EPA has ordered BP to change to a less toxic dispersant but significant damage has already been done.

The cherry on this most unsavory sundae came with the news that no less mainstream a news organization than CBS was recently ordered to leave public beaches by the Coast Guard. When the reporters protested, they were told that "This is BP's rules, not ours." As was pointed out on the Daily Kos, "It seems as if BP, a foreign corporation, has taken over a branch of the U.S. government and is ordering US citizens off of public beaches, with the Coast Guard acting as its enforcer."

We had grave concerns about Barack Obama from the time he became a serious candidate for the presidency. Obama ran for and won the world's most powerful office with a very spotty resume. He got his initial big boost from outlaw enterprises like Goldman-Sachs (which gave nearly $1 million to candidate Obama) but the oil companies weren't far behind. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, BP and its employees have given more money to Obama than to any other candidate over the past 20 years!

This is, of course, legalized bribery. And with the recent Supreme Court travesty of Citizens United, it will only get worse. This is not the country we signed on for; instead, it is a country, in Ralph Nader's words, "of, by and for the corporations". Contrary to his rhetorical flourishes, President Obama is just another sycophant to corporate America. We are risking the future of the planet and our species by allowing this deadly ruse to go on.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/05/22-6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Change you can believe in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Exactly. Regardless of what party, this is *what government is for*!!
The "talking point" being put out here is bullshit. What do we have government for? It's to protect us and our interests. This is their freaking job, I don't care if our President was Bush or Mother Teresa. This is a FUNDAMENTAL objective and RESPONSABILTY of government. To get in the middle and get it fixed. Assigning blame is for *after* it is resolved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's frightening that some Democrats soley see government through a partisan lense
There are some fundamental requirements of good Democratic governement that transend partisan politics. Partisans will go to extremes and in the end would cause the same problems we see with Republican partisans.

It is a fundamental Responsability for the government to take charge, and yes even ownership, of this. If we don't believe that what exactly do the supposed liberal Democrats on this board think that Government's role should be? Because the partisan take on this of some members here is far closer to libertarian/Republican views on government than they might realize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC