Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kaiser: Reconciliation Bill Changes to Private Insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:17 AM
Original message
Kaiser: Reconciliation Bill Changes to Private Insurance
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 09:12 AM by flpoljunkie
(Emphasis mine. Although it has not been widely publicized, members of Congress will be required to buy their health insurance on the exchange when it is up and running in 2014.)

White House/Congressional Leadership Reconciliation Bill
Health Care and Education Affordability Act of 2010
(H.R. 4872)

(Note: The reconciliation bill makes changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed by the Senate. The summary below includes the Senate bill language and incorporates changes to particular provisions made by the new legislation. The changes are identified by italicized text. If a provision was not addressed by the reconciliation bill, the Senate bill language has remained unchanged.)

Date Plan Announced March 18, 2010
Changes to Private Insurance

*Establish a temporary national high-risk pool to provide health coverage to individuals with pre-existing medical conditions. U.S. citizens and legal immigrants who have a pre-existing medical condition and who have been uninsured for at least six months will be eligible to enroll in the high-risk pool and receive subsidized premiums. Premiums for the pool will be established for a standard population and may vary by no more than 4 to 1 due to age; maximum cost-sharing will be limited to the current law HSA limit ($5,950/individual and $11,900/family in 2010). Appropriate $5 billion to finance the program. (Effective within 90 days of enactment until January 1, 2014)

*Require health plans to report the proportion of premium dollars spent on clinical services, quality, and other costs and provide rebates to consumers for the amount of the premium spent on clinical services and quality that is less than 85% for plans in the large group market and 80% for plans in the individual and small group markets. (Requirement to report medical loss ratio effective plan year 2010; requirement to provide rebates effective January 1, 2011)

*Adopt standards for financial and administrative transactions to promote administrative simplification. (Effective dates vary)

*Establish a process for reviewing increases in health plan premiums and require plans to justify increases. Require states to report on trends in premium increases and recommend whether certain plan should be excluded from the Exchange based on unjustified premium increases. Provide grants to states to support efforts to review and approve premium increases. (Effective beginning plan year 2010)

*Provide dependent coverage for children up to age 26 for all individual and group policies. (Effective six months following enactment)

*Prohibit individual and group health plans from placing lifetime limits on the dollar value of coverage and prohibit insurers from rescinding coverage except in cases of fraud. Prohibit pre-existing condition exclusions for children. (Effective six months following enactment) Beginning in January 2014, prohibit individual and group health plans from placing annual limits on the dollar value of coverage. Prior to January 2014, plans may only impose annual limits on coverage as determined by the Secretary.

*Grandfather existing individual and group plans with respect to new benefit standards, but require these grandfathered plans to extend dependent coverage to age 26, prohibit rescissions of coverage, and eliminate waiting periods for coverage of greater than 90 days. Require grandfathered group plans to eliminate lifetime limits on coverage and beginning in 2014, eliminate annual limits on coverage. Prior to 2014, grandfathered group plans may only impose annual limits as determined by the Secretary. Require grandfathered group plans to eliminate pre-existing condition exclusions for children within six months of enactment and by 2014 for adults. (Effective six months following enactment, except where otherwise specified)

*Establish an internet website to help residents identify health coverage options (effective July 1, 2010) and develop a standard format for presenting information on coverage options (effective 60 days following enactment).

*Develop standards for insurers to use in providing information on benefits and coverage. (Standards developed within 12 months following enactment; insurer must comply with standards within 24 months following enactment)

*Impose the same insurance market regulations relating to guarantee issue, premium rating, and prohibitions on pre-existing condition exclusions in the individual market, in the Exchange, and in the small group market (See new rating and market rules in Creation of insurance pooling mechanism.) (Effective January 1, 2014)

*Require all new policies (except stand-alone dental, vision, and long-term care insurance plans), including those offered through the Exchanges and those offered outside of the Exchanges, to comply with one of the four benefit categories. Existing individual and employer-sponsored plans do not have to meet the new benefit standards. (See description of benefit categories in Creation of insurance pooling mechanism.) (Effective January 1, 2014)

*Limit deductibles for health plans in the small group market to $2,000 for individuals and $4,000 for families unless contributions are offered that offset deductible amounts above these limits. This deductible limit will not affect the actuarial value of any plans. (Effective January 1, 2014)

*Limit any waiting periods for coverage to 90 days. (Effective January 1, 2014)

*Allow states the option of merging the individual and small group markets. (Effective January 1, 2014)

*Create a temporary reinsurance program to collect payments from health insurers in the individual and group markets to provide payments to plans in the individual market that cover high-risk individuals. Finance the reinsurance program through mandatory contributions by health insurers totaling $25 billion over three years. (Effective January 1, 2014 through December 2016)
Require risk adjustment in the individual and small group markets. (Effective January 1, 2014)

*Permit states to form health care choice compacts and allow insurers to sell policies in any state participating in the compact. Insurers selling policies through a compact would only be subject to the laws and regulations of the state where the policy is written or issued, except for rules pertaining to market conduct, unfair trade practices, network adequacy, and consumer protections. Compacts may only be approved if it is determined that the compact will provide coverage that is at least as comprehensive and affordable as coverage provided through the state Exchanges. (Regulations issued by July 1, 2013, compacts may not take effect before January 1, 2016)

*Establish the Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund within the Department of Health and Human Services and allocate $1 billion to implement health reform policies.

Sources of information http://www.democraticleader.house.gov/

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/sidebyside.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you for posting this
On a personal level, you saved me a lot of time because I was going to try to find if group plans were also going to cover kids until they are 26. This will be great news for many people with young adult kids.

Also thanks for your comment that members of Congress will get their plans via the exchenge. They REALLY need to publicize this. I don't know how many LTTE from the right speak of them excluding themselves - which they didn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. this is the only part of the bill that affects me
my step daughter was going off plan in may. she turns 23 next month. now she will have 3 more years.

I thought i heard they had something for early retirees but I see nothing for them???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. There was supposedly "something" that Senator Stabenow mentioned,
but with no detail.

This will likely affect us too. We have a 24 year old, who will be starting grad school in the fall. This is the last year she could be on my husband's plan - she's already too old for mine. In addition, we have a 22 year old, who has her own insurance from the volunteer Americorps job she has and a 19 year old in college. But, you never know what changes will come. (We paid COBRA for a year when our oldest was too ill to be in college - a condition for being on the insurance. ) This will likely be a welcome part of the bill for many with kids the ages of your step daughter and my kids - many who graduate college without finding a job with healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would have highlighted these too....

*Require health plans to report the proportion of premium dollars spent on clinical services, quality, and other costs and provide rebates to consumers for the amount of the premium spent on clinical services and quality that is less than 85% for plans in the large group market and 80% for plans in the individual and small group markets. (Requirement to report medical loss ratio effective plan year 2010; requirement to provide rebates effective January 1, 2011)

*Establish a process for reviewing increases in health plan premiums and require plans to justify increases. Require states to report on trends in premium increases and recommend whether certain plan should be excluded from the Exchange based on unjustified premium increases. Provide grants to states to support efforts to review and approve premium increases. (Effective beginning plan year 2010)


and thanks for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Good point, Clio! Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Review process = a list of very very naughty boys and girls
And if they don't shape up, why, why, they'll be on the list next year too! DiFi actually proposed a regulatory body with enforcement powers, but it got shot down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Have now highlighted your suggestions in the OP.
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 09:13 AM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. A little more clear now.
Don't know about anyone else but it's going to take some time for me to really wrap my head around the details of HCR. For example, the exchange--how does that work and who qualifies?

Now, H.R. 676 I understood completely: decent health care is a fundamental right, not a privilege, and everyone is covered. It could have been that simple, and I'm guessing that the CBO would have found it to be a fiscally positive plan, as well.

I'm glad we prevailed last night but I still don't know what it means for me and my family. And I don't want to stop fighting until we truly do have single payer, across the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think this requirement is very major regarding insurance plans will strongly encourage competition
Require states to report on trends in premium increases and recommend whether certain plan should be excluded from the Exchange based on unjustified premium increases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. This part needs to be closely watched
*Permit states to form health care choice compacts and allow insurers to sell policies in any state participating in the compact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. These policies must meet federal standards--unlike GOP's 'across state lines' policies
--which we all know is a 'race to the bottom' like credit cards were without federal standards required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is incredible information, flpoljunkie.
Care and law working in tandem. Thanks for posting. KnR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. How many FDL/RW talking points did this just shatter?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Was there an;ything re the temporary
pool for people who are uninsurable now? It was my understanding that would start up right away. I searched last night and found one place that mentioned it and that was it. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Reality.
1. How many ordinary people do you think will be able to afford to spend $5,950 to $11,900 a year on healthcare; especially if they have a pre-existing condition with pre-existing debt to go with it?

2. A good accountant and 3 years worth of lobbying and the 85% and 80% will be gone.

3. There is no such thing as administration simplification.

4. Reviewing increases and justifying increases? Oh really. Do the words "electric company" and "phone company" ring any bells?

I could go on knocking down the arguments above but its late and I think I'm going to go to bed instead. Just keep in mind the phrase "mountains of paperwork to be filled out on a yearly basis" and "the hell the GOP and pharmacy companies put your parents or grandparents through when they made them choose drug plans". The stuff you list is easily gotten around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. So we shouldn't have tried to do anything about health care reform because
there are lobbyists?

Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. That's not what I said at all.
Try a little honesty sometime. You'll be surprised at how much freer you feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. This is all pretty useless with no federal agency for enforcement
CA is right now refusing to enforce its anti-recission law against Anthem. Feinstein proposed an amendment setting up a federal agency for just that reason. It failed. The anti-trust exemption stays. That by itself means NO REGULATION whatsoever, no matter what the bill says they ought to do theoretically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC