Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. John Larson, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus: "We have 216." Stupak: "Not yet."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:13 AM
Original message
Rep. John Larson, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus: "We have 216." Stupak: "Not yet."
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 10:14 AM by jenmito
Paraphrasing, but Rep. Larson DID say on CNN this morning that they have the 216 needed, but when Stupak was on MSNBC and asked about that, HE claimed they were two votes short. Hmmm...I wonder if Stupak is saying that to try to be relevant, to try to scare the other Dems. into thinking they'll need to get Obama to write a signing statement assuring him there won't be any federal funding for abortions. Stupak can get lost-WE HAVE THE VOTES! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is a deal being worked out regarding an Executive Order saying that no
federal funds will be used from this bill for abortions. I think we will pick up or already have the votes we need. Stupak is being a total ahole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, I heard Luke Russert report it would be an executive order re-affirming that
the Hyde amendment, the status quo, will be the law in this bill. Nothin' wrong with that IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The executive order is a face-saver for Stupak.
It's nothing more than Hyde Amendment stuff - Stupak knows he lost the Rolodex wars with Pelosi, now they're just diving for cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly. Making clear that the Hyde amendment will be the rule they go by is nowhere NEAR Stupak's
amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC