Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why isn't Obama demanding that a strong public option be included in any bill? n/t

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:57 PM
Original message
Why isn't Obama demanding that a strong public option be included in any bill? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe that was part of the deal he made in closed-door discussions
with the insurance companies before the bills even came to the floor?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Bingo! And he won't own up to the truth to the people that elected him
NY Times Reporter Confirms Obama Made Deal to Kill Public Option

Miles Mogulescu
Entertainment attorney, writer, and political activist
Posted: March 16, 2010 12:57 PM


For months I've been reporting in The Huffington Post that President Obama made a backroom deal last summer with the for-profit hospital lobby that he would make sure there would be no national public option in the final health reform legislation. (See here, here and here). I've been increasingly frustrated that except for an initial story last August in the New York Times, no major media outlet has picked up this important story and investigated further.

Hopefully, that's changing. On Monday, Ed Shultz interviewed New York Times Washington reporter David Kirkpatrick on his MSNBC TV show, and Kirkpatrick confirmed the existence of the deal. Shultz quoted Chip Kahn, chief lobbyist for the for-profit hospital industry on Kahn's confidence that the White House would honor the no public option deal, and Kirkpatrick responded:

"That's a lobbyist for the hospital industry and he's talking about the hospital industry's specific deal with the White House and the Senate Finance Committee and, yeah, I think the hospital industry's got a deal here. There really were only two deals, meaning quid pro quo handshake deals on both sides, one with the hospitals and the other with the drug industry. And I think what you're interested in is that in the background of these deals was the presumption, shared on behalf of the lobbyists on the one side and the White House on the other, that the public option was not going to be in the final product."

Kirkpatrick also acknowledged that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina had confirmed the existence of the deal.

This should be big news. Even while President Obama was saying that he thought a public option was a good idea and encouraging supporters to believe his healthcare plan would include one, he had promised for-profit hospital lobbyists that there would be no public option in the final bill.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/ny-times-reporter-confirm_b_500999.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Honesty and principles are two things sorely lacking in politics.
Obama, unfortunately, is just another two-faced politician, participating in a backroom deal to fleece the public. It's shitful, but short of insurrection, which Americans don't have the stomach for, we're simply screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because he doesn't have the votes in Congress nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. +100 for truthtelling! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. So, what's the point of this bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. ding, ding!
I remember Congress, which was to be a co-equal branch of government, not answerable to the President, or any "strong-arming."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. That's the talking point from the Ministry of Truth
Obama himself admitted he killed the public option during his recent interview on Faux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Because he didn't have the votes in Congress
If you want someone to get mad at, get mad at Joe Lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. because he doesn't WANT a public Option -- he kills them!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/whos-killing-the-public-o_b_334372.html

Talking points cover the fact that O and Rahm made a back room deal to kill any PO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
54. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
35. BULLSHIP
they had reconciliation, they are using it now, they could have used it then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Obama can't kill anything the supermajority wants.
Veto doesn't work that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. +9999999999999
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
46. Exactly. With 178 republicans, 54 Blue Dogs (there's a majority) plus numerous other
conservative and moderate Democrats who tremble when they hear "socialized medicine", single payer or a national health service (as much as we want one) wouldn't stand a chance unless we believe that the magic of our ideas will win the day despite the nature of congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. That's the excuse, but not the reason. n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. It would be to the detriment of the health insurance industry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is supposed to be a vote on this in a few months. Maybe that is the deal he made
with Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Bets are this doesnt happen. At least not for 5-10 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. He hasn't been demanding that since last spring.
Why would he suddenly start demanding a strong public option now? He's made it clear for months that he doesn't think it's important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why? If it were there you'd still be complaining
It's insurance, not care.

You would have to pay a premium.

You'd still be complaining.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because he was bullshitting about it when running for President.
It's a broken campaign pledge. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PolNewf Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because he was banging his head against a brick wall n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Private Insurance Industry paid out
hundreds of millions of dollars to make it go away. Obama himself got over $20 million from them. They placed their bets on Democrats this time. McCain only got one third of that. He wasn't as good a salesman.

Some information on how the Ins Ind. worked and paid to stop a PO from being part of Health Care Reform:

http://hcfan.3cdn.net/a9ce29d3038ef8a1e1_dhm6b9q0l.pdf

Insurance industry officials see great opportunity in serving government-run programs because other
markets are not growing. That is because private buyers of insurance are steadily being priced out of
the market. During 2009, the five insurers boosted enrollment in government-subsidized programs
administered by private plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, by 688,000.
Medicaid growth is the
biggest single driver of increased national health spending, according to a study released Feb. 4
by the policy journal Health Affairs.


The Obama administration has just handed them soaring profits for the foreseeable future, with public money, as they will now get to control the subsidies we keep hearing about, which political operatives neglect to be honest about. We could have had a Single Payer system that would have cost far less with them OUT of the picture. So, why did Democrats do this?

It was a brilliant maneuver. A Republican dream that Democrats have made come true. It cost them a lot, but they will be well rewarded with our tax dollars as well as the premiums that some will still be paying as soon as this bill passes.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Recall: the House passed a Bill w/PO and the Senate had 50 votes for the PO..but it was STILL killed
Why? Because Money swings all votes. Corporations paid out and the politicians listened...again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. This bill is about to pass with flying colors. That must just eat you up, eh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #20
38. on the one hand, it's nice to see angry teabaggers
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 02:05 AM by Skittles
on the other hand, it is still a piece of shit bill that reforms nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. brentspeak, if you are intending to constructively criticize the President, then you should present
Edited on Sat Mar-20-10 07:11 PM by Writer
a solution to what you see wrong here. What's the solution? How would you make that solution happen?

Edit to add one other thing: As I remember, Joe Lieberman refused to vote for the bill until they removed the public option. And they needed his vote to reach 60 to vote for cloture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You're asking this particular DUer to present a solution when he complains about Obama???
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It's worth a try, I guess.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. He would send those in Congress that didn't vote the way he wants
to the FEMA re-education camps.


People here have a very strange idea as to how our government works. They want Obama to be a dictator, like Bush tried to be, and get angry when he respects the other branches of our government.

Without the votes, and a smart president knows the number beforehand, the proposed legislation is dead on arrival, a losing proposition, and not worth pursuing.

The votes for a public option were never there.

Blame the Senate, blame the House.

A smart man knows which battles to fight; those that can be won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #27
39. bullship
Obama was front center pushing the $700 Billion "bailout" for the crooked bankers. Then he was front/center arm twisting the dems for the new defense appropriations. Then when it comes time for the real health care reform like he promiesed? CRICKETS. Obama is no-where to be seen.

and they have reconciliation, they are threatening it now, how come they didn't use it then? the didn't need 60, all they needed was 51.

Obama is a bought and paid for corporatist, it's really sad seeing how many DUers believe the wholly owned corporate television and all the propaganda it spews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. The votes weren't there.
Repeat this to yourself until you understand.

The votes in the Senate weren't there.

You have shown you do not understand the process. See post #22.

If the public option was included in the Senate bill, they would never have 60 votes for cloture, and the bill would essentially have been killed.

Only after cloture is passed limiting debate and amendments can they go the reconciliation route with a simple majority on a finalized bill coming out of conference.

And there was nothing on Earth that can change that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #39
55. +1 They had the votes then and could easily have them now.
Its obvious that this isn't what they (Obama and Rahm) want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. It seems you start threads to keep up animosity towards Obama.
A few people I haven't seen posting on this board since everyone is looking forward to, hopefully, a positive vote tomorrow have suddenly come back en masse to post more of their negative that they went silent on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. Public Options and Single Payer are only campaign slogans, not to be confused with actual policy
you can believe in. If DLC "New Dems" didn't rely on this type of campaign rhetoric, then what would set them apart from their GOP challenger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. You see how fucking hard it is to get votes without it?
Thats why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. He doesn't it get it. We have Rep. Spit on, called names...
Any other plan wouldn't even see the light of day out of that place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
57. It'd be easier to get the votes with the Public Option
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 03:21 PM by The Hope Mobile
You see that the majority of resistance amongst Dems is because they know the PO should be on this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
31. because he doesn't give a fuck about the public option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. tomorrow, when the bill has passed, I will do a little dance in your honor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. wait a while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. Dance
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 02:15 AM by Kalun D
and your dancing on the graves of all the people in this country who die from lack of health care coverage.

Just like Obama and the crooked greed pig insurance companies that he made back door deals with.

Unlike any other nation in the developed world, when it comes to health care this country is a piece of sh*t.

Go on and do your dance of the dead. Right along with all the sheeple that believe whatever the Orwell corporate TV news tells them. "this is health care "reform""

no it's not, it's just the 3rd major predatory capitalist segment to get a multi-billion dollar giveaway from the DLC corporatist Obama admin, right behind the crooked bankers and the defense contractor oil-war death skulls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. did the Repukes teach you that safety dance, friend?
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 11:49 AM by Aramchek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. No, it was the DLC corporate whores
So just because a politician has a D after their name makes them okay? They're can't possibly be corrupt?

what's the diff between a sold out corporate whore repug and a sold out corporate whore dem?

All those dead people are different somehow when they die under a Dem admin? All the civilians in Iraq and Afghan? All the people that die from lack of health care when we spend as much money on bombs as the next 10 countries combined?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
56. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
34. Why doesn't Jerry Garcia come back to life and tour with The Dead?
Why do people put pears and other fruit in Jello and not Vienna sausages?

How can Jim Inhofe live with himself?

When is the Rapture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lordcommander Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
45. Why does Rice play Texas?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
58. Well yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
36. This is the best he could get with this group of Dems in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
43. because he's an intelligent person who can understand reality
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
44. Simple. Because there aren't enuf votes to pass that.
I don't know WHY people can't get that thru their heads.

No, it wouldn't force people to vote for it, simply if Obama "demanded" it. The politicians still have to get re-elected in November by tehir constituents. The Dems are having a hard enuf time getting Dems to vote for a moderate bill, given the successful demonizing of the bill by the Republicans of just the moderate bill such that even Dems NOT in conservative areas are facing uphill battle to win re-election.

The citizens have not shown in polls that they support single payer or public option.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. that's funny
Obama was front center twisting arms on the $700 Billion giveaway

the citizens were against that something like 9 to 1.

Obama was front center twisting arms on defense appropriation for the oil wars

pretty sure the citizen majority is against the wars

Where was Obama this last year on real health care reform? twisting arms or CRICKETS?

don't know what polls you are looking at a majority has always wanted real health care reform

what your polls are showing is the way the corporate whore TV is painting the issue to make people think they don't want single payer/public option
and public opinion sure didn't bother Obama when he helped ram the $700 billion "bailout" through congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage Inc. Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
49. Water under Bridge
Personally, I'm fucking exhausted! Let's just do this thing today, take a nap, and return to the battle refreshed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. You better wake up then
cuz there's a new emphasis by the mods to delete purely personal attacks like you just made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
53. Because he is owned by the Health Insurance parasites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC