|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 01:10 AM Original message |
Tony Perkins of Family Research Council Bumped From Prayer Lunch - May I say.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
1. "force the military to embrace homosexuality" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. ooh! good catch. And I couldn't agree more with his comment about it forcing a zero-tolerance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 08:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Devine, what a GREAT PHOTO!! Love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DailyGrind51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 07:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Hey, Tony, the Alexander the Great (and gay) conquered the known world! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-28-10 02:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
25. someone needs to delve deep into this freak's life and put all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
2. I don't know what Perkins is all upset about. Obama favoring a repeal of DADT is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. not much of the midas touch so far, I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. ...considering the repeal is going to be stuck into the 2011 defense budget, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. Of course he has no objection to the direct force of his religion on those in the military, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
6. The Righties will be all in a twit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 05:27 AM Response to Original message |
7. The UnRec feature needs removed. When a story is fully about an asshat repug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 11:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. I don't think so. When a story deserves rec it will get it regardless of those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
8. Wow, rec'd. And he has the gall to invoke 'witch hunts' when that's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
11. Chaplins have managed to censor that whole "thou shalt not kill" thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
13. Wonder when he'll get his apology from Obama and maybe an offer to co-host.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
14. Ignorant fucking piece of filth moron |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southernyankeebelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
15. My husband was a chaplain's assistant in the army and I remember that the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
16. Good. May this example be well-imitated. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
17. All the more reason for chaplains to be restricted on their activities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Today (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. Cancel the entire "Prayer" activity(ies). I don't want any prayer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
20. Good! He wasn't "uninvited". He was not invited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
21. Haters unwelcome at prayer breakfast? Imagine that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 07:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. This is the Prayer Bereakfast sponsored by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tledford (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
23. What a lunatic imbecile. Surely a self-loathing closet case. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-27-10 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
24. Sanctimonius slimeball! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-28-10 05:34 AM Response to Original message |
26. ..."chaplains would bear the heaviest burden"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC