Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's health care bill: nothing new in my opinion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:03 AM
Original message
Obama's health care bill: nothing new in my opinion
Same bullshit Senate Bill with no public option a waste of time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just heard this on NPR - same ol' same ol' - once again, screw the voters. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
30. My exact thought when I heard it on the same show. brian L:ehrer..
What a disappointment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Was waiting for some one to come out and condemn Obama for this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hardly a condemnation - just the facts jack. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Except your condemnation is 100% fact free. Spin fail. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. The facts are same ol' same ol' - as I said. No spin involved...
Edited on Mon Feb-22-10 11:32 AM by polichick
Though we were referring to the op.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Agree 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I didn't really expect much
It's mostly an attempt to squash any "legitimate" criticism from the GOP, so he removed the Nebraska exemption. He monkeyed a bit with the tax provisions, but mostly in a way to for the GOP to either call for more/earlier taxes, or to call for higher deficits. In the end it is still health insurance reform, not health care reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yep - that's pretty much it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. intersesting that when the Senate starts taking head counts on support of public option
Obama comes out with his supposed health care bill. Sounds to me he doesn't want the public option.Can't wait to hear Big Ed today on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yeah - wonder if Ed will be on fire today or waiting to see what happens this week. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. He started to craft this before some in the Senate came out in support of this.
I think he was working on the bill when the health care summit was announced or even before that.

Some in the Senate want it and some don't.
I wonder what a real count would be...45? 48? Could we get to 50 on the public option? I wish we could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bullshit
It's even better than the|House bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. LINK PLEASE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's in the comment.
How long have you been here?

Click on the word better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. That link does not show that it is "Better."
That is a matter of opinion.

They just lay out the differences for us to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. "That is a matter of opinion."
Yeah, and I didn't expect you to agree.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Well that's fine. My point was that the link did NOT provide an argument as to "best."
You may THINK it is better, but your link did not show that.

This happens too often in these sorts of exchanges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Mixed bag at best
A few things are better, mostly it's a wash. Ultimately there's nothing in any of these to ensure that people will actually be able to afford their healthcare. Worse, it ensures that in order to get it they have to pay the profits of insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. "A few things are better, mostly it's a wash."
Edited on Mon Feb-22-10 11:25 AM by ProSense
Right, the rate regulation, that didn't exist in either bill, makes it a wash:

The president’s bill would grant the federal health and human services secretary new authority to review, and to block, premium increases by private insurers, potentially superseding state insurance regulators. The bill would create a new Health Insurance Rate Authority, comprised of health industry experts that would issue an annual report setting the parameters for reasonable rate increases based on conditions in the market.

link


As do increasing subsidies, eliminating Stupak, and closing the donut hole completely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Authority, but no mandate
Look, I've got a Public Service Commmission in my own state that is suppose to regulate utility costs. It doesn't hardly do anything. I've got an insurance commissioner that's suppose to do the same thing for insurance costs. Our insurance situation down here is a complete mess. Promises to regulate our way out of high priced medical care don't impress me. I like the donut hole fix. I don't like the complete and utter lack of a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. yep. More transfer of wealth to the disease management corporations. Nothing new
here. A few tweaks at the edges, nothing closely resembling health CARE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rate regulation is stronger than a public option. There I fucking said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why pretend we can only have one or the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. No one is pretending that. I'm just responding to the BS in the OP.
I'd still love to have a government offered insurance plan I could buy as opposed to a privately owned plan. But if the end result is that people can actually get covered and stay covered and the prices are confined to reasonable amounts, then I could really care less how thats achieved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. +1. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Regulation, a lobbiest dream
This whole health insurance reform effort has been a conflict between government run vs regulation model. Regulation is the preferred solution for politicians because it creates a huge avenue for lobbying, and the money that comes with it. Rahm has always been interested in the campaign cash and has preferred the regulation model. This HCR bill should do everything for health care that regulation of the banking industry did for us there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Perhaps you should first learn how to spell lobbyist, THEN make up some BS.
Wow, I can't believe someone is actually trying to formulate an argument against regulating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. As compared to what?
There are times to regulate, and times to control. Regulation brings with it the troubles of lobbying. And really, there are innumerable current examples of how, in the long term, the very governmental organizations can morph into advocates for the very industries they are suppose to regulate. It isn't clear how we'll ever clean up the finacial services industry. I can't see setting up the same system for health care as a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. Please provide a link to the contents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. Agreed. They put a few shiny sprinkes on the rotten Senate Bill.
It's still a big concession to the Insurance Industry, who apparently own our entire government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftygolfer Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. I'm just not smart enough
Someone tell me straight up. Will this make it easier for me to get healthcare? Honestly, that's my concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC