Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agreement Is Near on New Overseer of Banking Risks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:49 AM
Original message
Agreement Is Near on New Overseer of Banking Risks
Edited on Thu Feb-18-10 11:51 AM by ProSense

Agreement Is Near on New Overseer of Banking Risks

By SEWELL CHAN
Published: February 17, 2010

WASHINGTON — The Senate and the Obama administration are nearing agreement on forming a council of regulators, led by the Treasury secretary, to identify systemic risk to the nation’s financial system, officials said Wednesday.

The issue is one of the most fundamental in the contentious effort to overhaul regulation after the financial crisis, and addresses one of the primary lessons of the near debacle: that no one had been assigned to ensure the stability of the system as a whole and detect the kinds of excessive risk-taking and imbalances that could rock an entire economy.

<...>

The effect would be to diminish the authority of the Federal Reserve, whose regulation of banks has been criticized for failing to head off the problems.

<...>

Legislation passed by the House in December to reshape the regulatory system gave the Fed more input on systemic risk than the Senate concept would.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Umm, I think you want us to recommend the post? I think anything
that takes the Fed down a notch or twenty is well worth while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcnealystephanie Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Banking Risks
As is generally the case is Washington...a grand new organizational scheme is being considered, rather than making existing regulatory regime work better. Everyone can agree that people running America's larger financial organizations can't be trusted, hence the need to close regulatory gaps and "undo" some of the freebees Congress threw in over the years.
We can achieve adequate regulation under the current regulatory regime with a few well advised changes. First, eliminate firms trading for their own account. Our recent history has shown that wall street firms will chose their interest over their customer's every time. Second, all investments, including derivatives, ought to have capital requirements as is the case for most other investments on the balance sheet. Every investment on the balance sheet ought to be accounted for with the firm's own capital. Third, reduce FDIC insurance to $50,000 per account. This will help diversify the industry by making it more difficult to grow using subsidized funds.
Stephanie Mcnealy
Famous Philanthropist Customer Service Team
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. There will be no financial reform.
The WTO will not allow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. There will be no financial reform.
The WTO will not allow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC