Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EVEN DUMBER THAN WE THOUGHT.... (Palin)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:22 PM
Original message
EVEN DUMBER THAN WE THOUGHT.... (Palin)
EVEN DUMBER THAN WE THOUGHT....

<...>

Nevertheless, Palin still feels comfortable talking about foreign policy, and even giving advice to the president. Over the weekend, for example, Palin said President Obama would be in much better shape if only he'd initiate a war against Iran. Another U.S. invasion of a Middle Eastern country, she seriously argued, would ensure the president's re-election.

"Say (the president) played, and I got this from (Pat) Buchanan, reading one of his columns the other day. Say he played the war card. Say he decided to declare war on Iran, or decided to really come out and do whatever he could to support Israel, which I would like him to do. But that changes the dynamics in what we can assume is going to happen between now and three years. (...)

"I'm saying, if he did, things would dramatically change if he decided to toughen up and do all that he can to secure our nation and our allies. I think people would perhaps shift their thinking a little bit and decide, well, maybe he's tougher than we think he is today."

Palin "got this" from "reading" one of Pat Buchanan's columns -- apparently this one, headlined, "Will Obama Play The War Card?"

The problem, of course, is that Palin didn't get quite past the headline. Buchanan argued against going to war with Iran. While Daniel Pipes said invading Iran would be a boon to Obama's presidency, Buchanan argued the opposite.

<...>

Sarah Palin's capacity to be a constant embarrassment to herself is limitless.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Every single time I think she cannot top herself in the stupidity department,
she surprises me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flakey_foont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. she doesn't surprise me one bit
she has already set the bar incredibly low

it's the folks who actually take her seriously, are the ones who astonish moi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
28. Yes-astonish! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. but the REAL question is - WHY THE FUCK DIDN'T THE "INTERVIEWER" ASK HER THAT?!!!
These media WHORES just sit there like a wannabe Larry King...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Not when the interviewer is Chris
"I jjust wanna be famous like Dad but I have no talent" Wallace,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dumber than a bag of Palins
It's my new saying.

So in other words, either she or one of her lackeys read the Buchanan article TITLE and then composed a policy point around it.

Smooth move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. how does she do it?
Let's not find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tledford Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Except that she is so clueless she is unaware that she SHOULD be embarrassed. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Her cavalier attitude to war
as a political tool is really breathtaking!! Aggressive, nasty, and stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. But she can't be cavalier if her own son is an active duty soldier
can she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. Oh, but she can.
Imagine her as president. Her son's safety would then, and maybe even now, be given great consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. It is breathtaking, Nancy.
And pretty scary considering the number of people that view her favorably. Aggressive, nasty and stupid-yes, I agree that is a BAD combination. I've always Bush's Arrogance + Stupidity was bad enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's suddenly become dumb to pimp endless war?
Funny--it's worked remarkably well for both parties in recent years.

Palin is no genius, but she knows which way to babble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think you missed the point. Still,
"Palin is no genius"

You're right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think I addressed your point...
...but I disagree that Palin necessarily misunderstood Buchanan's. There's a reason why her name is bandied about for the presidency with a straight face, and his isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. "I disagree that Palin necessarily misunderstood Buchanan's" Really?
She could have cited Pipes, but if you really think she was being clever, so be it.

Frankly, this just makes her look really stupid, and makes it easier to portray her as an idiot.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Clever? Not very.
Just not daring enough to be a real maverick. She toes the hard-right line at every opportunity, and that means supporting war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is sad but true, if Obama would take out Iran the
American people always rally round the President until the war turns sour. Look at what the Iraq war did for Bush Sr. and W's polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. If President Obama went to war with Iran the Republicans would
not, I repeat would not support him.

They will ALWAYS take the opposite stance for whatever he proposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Disagree. He'd force a Congressional war vote
Edited on Wed Feb-10-10 07:12 AM by BadgerKid
thereby getting the 'can'ts ON RECORD.

Edit: clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think she mentioned reading Buchanan's column
to show she is reading newsy things. Good gawd... what a freakin' moran she is! :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. You nailed it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. did she say who would pay the bill?
Repukes never bother their pretty little minds over funding of eternal war, do they? I'd say one more war should just about end the US of A---"out of business" sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Rec #23! I love when that happens.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's see, Palin is like those DUers that respond to a OP's headline rather than read the story?
Is that the point of your OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flash Bazbo Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Colbert is right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. someone who never served, advising war to make someone look "tough"
un-fucking-believable :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. Is there a polite way to say ...

Retard?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
21. She couldn't possibly be dumber than I thought.
But I love your post anyway.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonofabush Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
22. That... is bad.
That's all I have to say, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kltpzyxm Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
23. Palin dumber than we thought?
That's unpossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. I will always hate John McCain for catapulting that idiot into the national spotlight.
'Choosing' Palin (or being forced to choose her) is what he should be remembered for. That 'choice' alone showed how incredibly weak and lacking in character he is. I had never heard of Palin before 2008 and I wish I could go back to that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Which proves that all the crock about McCain being a great American patriot
if he were he would not have picked this person to be next in line to the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I only thought that he was a lousy pilot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
30. Where would he find the troops? Our army is stretched to the limit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC