Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ben Nelson To Filibuster Key Obama Labor Nominee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 08:22 AM
Original message
Ben Nelson To Filibuster Key Obama Labor Nominee

In a move that will further irritate his Democratic critics, Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) announced on Monday evening that he would not just oppose but also help filibuster President Barack Obama's nominee to a key labor relations agency

In a statement from his office, the Nebraska Democrat announced that he would oppose cloture for Craig Becker's appointment to the National Labor Relations Board, all but assuring that confirmation won't take place.

"Mr. Becker's previous statements strongly indicate that he would take an aggressive personal agenda to the NLRB, and that he would pursue a personal agenda there, rather than that of the Administration," said Senator Nelson. "This is of great concern, considering that the Board's main responsibility is to resolve labor disputes with an even and impartial hand. In addition, the nominee's statements fly in the face of Nebraska's Right to Work laws, which have been credited in part with our excellent business climate that has attracted employers and many good jobs to Nebraska. Considering these matters, I will oppose the upcoming cloture motion and the nomination."

Becker has been an associate general counsel for the Service Employees International Union since 1990 and was previously counsel for the AFL-CIO. His nomination to the NLRB already appeared in peril after the victory of Scott Brown in the Massachusetts Senate election. He had previously been held up in Congress by objections from Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) -- who worried he was too allied with unions -- before being re-nominated by Obama in January.

continued>>>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/08/ben-nelson-to-filibuster_n_454437.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. How DARE we have a pro-labor person on the National Labor Relations Board!
Edited on Tue Feb-09-10 08:28 AM by Tesha
And isn't just sweet that a "Democrat" is blocking the
appointment? And some folks here wonder why labor
doesn't seem to love us as much as they used-to...

You know, I'm starting to wonder if there will be a single
traditional Democatic constituency left come November 2nd.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgcgulfcoast Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. nelson is in big trouble
i guess he thinks its best to kiss us off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radhika Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. He Doesn't Run until 2012!
..and the Nebraska Democratic Party has already been running pro-Nelson ads in his home state. Obviously to rebut anti-Nelson healthcare ads created by Progressives.

http://www.americablog.com/2010/02/dnc-admits-they-paid-500000-for-ads.html

WTF are they doing this (with donor funds, many have noted) when he is actively undermining the well-being of his state, its workers, the uninsured and catering to special interests only. I guess I answered my own question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Since when does Nelson care about the goals of the Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It makes a convenient "fig leaf" for him. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm pretty sure Obama would not have nominated him if he was concerned about
the BS that you're talking about, Ben. There seems to be no concern when nominees will fulfill the role of corporate whore, but then it's time to whip out the filibuster when a guy who will fight for US labor comes aboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Some of these "democrats" are just as bad as the GOP!
Course, that's not new, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The problem is that if Obama really went after Nelson,
and somehow forced him to vote with the rest of the party, it would virtually guarantee that he'd just get replaced by a real Republican.

Nebraska is a red, red state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah. At some point even Pres. Obama has got to start
thinking along those lines, despite what he told them at the televised conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. What Obama needs to do
is focus on what he can actually get passed with the present Congress.

To paraphrase an idiom from the previous administration - he has to work with the Congress that he has, not the Congress that he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Couldn't have said it better. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Well, given that the present Congress has a Senate with a 41-seat Republican majority....
the simplest solution would be to have Jim DeMint write all the bills, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. With Democrats like these, who needs Republicans?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. There it goes again that fucking left and so called "progressives"..... oh wait.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Reid needs to call this fool's bluff and force him to actually fillibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. not this shit again
God damn it Nelson you stupid fuck -- if it ain't the GOP holding things up, then it's one of you fucking sold out fake Democrats.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Douche bag
This guy is no better than Lieberman. A fucking corrupt, traitorous, tool. An embarrassment not just to the democratic party, but to the human race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. Recess-appoint him. Problem solved. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Notice you never see Ben on any TV interview shows?
I would like to see some credible newsperson (perhaps David Schuster) ask this guy some tough questions about the stands he's taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's all Obama's fault again......
Because that's easy to think and to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC