Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UPDATED: Science Triumphs in Obama's 2011 Budget Request

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 02:43 PM
Original message
UPDATED: Science Triumphs in Obama's 2011 Budget Request

UPDATED: Science Triumphs in Obama's 2011 Budget Request

by Jeffrey Mervis

Wow. A first, quick look at what President Barack Obama wants to spend next year on science shows across-the-board increases for research and training. Those gains come despite the president's plan to freeze domestic discretionary programs in hopes of reducing a $1.4 trillion deficit.

Here's some of what the president's $3.8 trillion 2011 budget request, submitted this morning, could mean for science, if Congress were to go along:

  • A $1 billion increase, to $32.1 billion, for the National Institutes of Health. That 3%-plus boost is aimed at keeping NIH on pace with inflationary costs for doing biomedical research.
  • A $550 million boost, to $7.4 billion, for the National Science Foundation. Almost all of that 8% increase would go to NSF's six research directorates, with a special emphasis on clean energy and sustainability. Its education and training programs would rise by 2%.
  • A $226 million hike, to $5.1 billion, for the Office of Science within the Department of Energy (DOE). The department's 3-year-old effort to jump-start a low-carbon economy, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, would get $300 million as its first annual budget. A scaled-down education and training initiative, RE-ENERGYSE, would get $74 million, after Congress rejected a much larger program proposed last year.
  • A $540 million boost, to $5 billion, for science programs within NASA. The increase comes as part of the Administration's proposed reshuffling of priorities on human space exploration. That plan includes a heavy-lift rocket for exploration beyond the moon and the commercial sector taking on responsibility for getting astronauts to the low-Earth-orbit international space station.
  • A $164 million jump, to $429 million, in the competitively awarded research programs at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
  • A $67 million increase, to $587 million, for the basic science programs at the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
NIST is one of three agencies—NSF and DOE's Office of Science round out the trio—that have been promised a doubled research budget over 10 years. The Administration's 2011 budget for all three is in line with that pledge.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. McCain would have increased funding for demonic possession and corrupted humors. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is very cool. Hope Congress goes along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's a breath of fresh air.
I'd like to see what these institutes got in the Bush budgets, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, but it's not the moon and therefore it is worthless.


MOON!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. But he's cutting funding for Great Lakes restoration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Looks like it's specific to a vehicle with significant technological problems. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, there's two things involed in the article
that's a separate thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of course. This man is probably the only one who knows what they're doing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC