|
I found the speech somewhat unfocused. I heard a few things I liked, but I am skeptical of the likeliness of having them passed into law. I heard a few things that made me mad. What I did not hear were any "eureka, he really gets it" statements.
I did not see any clear lines in the sand on issues I really care about, which to my jaded eye means that no republican or blue dog has anything to worry about when they oppose his generally worded ideas. The carrots were relatively weak, relying on the common decency of his opposition, which I think is a bad tactic. I didn't hear the stick. There were two mentions of a veto, but they were generic and vague enough that I would guess they didn't scare anyone right of Howard Dean.
I see some hope in what he said about Iraq, but I did not find it to have the necessary clarity for my peace of mind. Out in August, good. Not soon enough for my taste, but worth supporting. But if its only "Combat troops" out, not good. Are we getting out or not? This is not a place for half measures and partials. I want us really, legitimately fully out of there. And what about our hired merc's? Nary a mention, much less a promise to end their stay
I also expected more on DADT. Actually, I didn't. I was skeptical that it would really get a mention. But whats the point of it, when there was nothing concrete? I feel it was a waste to make a somewhat familiar sounding promise to work with the legislature. I wanted "we will repeal this wrongful law" or "I will fight as hard as I have to to repeal this". I know he wasn't inclined to "I will not be enforcing this inhumane law", but he is the president of the country. He is the public face of the party that controls majorities in both legislative bodies, and in 2 of three of our branches of government. Give me something I can sink my teeth into, carry around, rattle about, and proudly show off to my Canadian wife as proof that we really are becoming a civilized country.
I liked his take on doing things for small business, but I wanted some definition on small business. I have a feeling that a lot of whatever resources are put to that will not end up where most of us would want them to. I would have loved some addressing of the fact that there are crooked US attorneys currently serving and that they will be replaced. The good with the bad. That's a normal presidential thing to do, and this would have been a great time for it. It would have won him some leeway from the left, and is, I believe a costless thing to do for the general popular opinion.
I saw a comment somewhere else that this was a "This is some stuff I had to throw together because you Dingusi(dinguses?) didn't manage to pass HCR with super majorities" speech. That seems to have summed it up for me. It was not the best speech, and I find the immediate raves here disconcerting. It was an ok speech. I am someone who avoids promises to do things I am not fully committed to. The tone of this speech was darned familiar to me. Not a promise, not a commitment, but a positive sounding, ultimately non substantial answer. Which is both positive and negative. I read into that that Obama still has his honor. He doesn't want to make a promise that he may not keep. But it is un fulfilling, because I want that fighting spirit that will engage, make that promise, and fight to keep it.
So I have hope. But its pretty battered. I am ready to move past hope to action. We did the electing, now its time for the governing.
|